Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Tuesday May 13 2014, @04:26AM   Printer-friendly
from the chasing-the-cancer-cure-dragon dept.

Rare byproduct of marine bacteria kills cancer cells by snipping their DNA:

Yale University researchers have determined how a scarce molecule produced by marine bacteria can kill cancer cells, paving the way for the development of new, low-dose chemotherapies.

The molecule, lomaiviticin A, was previously shown to be lethal to cultured human cancer cells, but the mechanism of its operation remained unsolved for well over a decade. In a series of experiments, Yale scientists Seth Herzon, Peter Glazer, and colleagues show that the molecule nicks, cleaves, and ultimately destroys cancer cells' DNA, preventing replication.

"DNA is one of the primary targets of anticancer agents, and cleavage of both DNA chains is the most potent form of DNA damage," said Herzon, professor of chemistry. "But few anticancer agents are able to directly cleave DNA. The discovery that lomaiviticin A is capable of this suggests it could be very useful as a novel chemotherapy, possibly at low doses."

The abstract and paper can be found here.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by GreatAuntAnesthesia on Tuesday May 13 2014, @09:28AM

    by GreatAuntAnesthesia (3275) on Tuesday May 13 2014, @09:28AM (#42609) Journal

    > DNA is one of the primary targets of anticancer agents, and cleavage

    Uh huhhuhhuhuh. Huhuh.

    Sorry.

    Back in the Victorian era people used to go and bathe in the sea to cure their ills, leading to the birth of the traditional British seaside holiday town. I wonder if this chemical (and possibly others as yet undiscovered) are the reason that the sea was thought to have restorative powers. Maybe this scarce chemical was less scarce back in those days, before pollution and overfishing had really started to affect marine environments.

    Another body of water thought to have the power to heal is the Ganges, which is is so heavily polluted that it really ought to be a toxic swamp by now. However it really does seem to have the ability to somehow mitigate the shit thrown into it and remain (more or less) drinkable. Maybe there is some other naturally occurring chemical in that river, similar to this one.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Interesting=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 13 2014, @11:00AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 13 2014, @11:00AM (#42633)

    Another body of water thought to have the power to heal is the Ganges, which is is so heavily polluted that it really ought to be a toxic swamp by now. However it really does seem to have the ability to somehow mitigate the shit thrown into it and remain (more or less) drinkable.

    Let's bottle Ganges water and sell it to queers as Steve Jobs drinkable curative urine.

  • (Score: 1) by Ezber Bozmak on Tuesday May 13 2014, @11:21AM

    by Ezber Bozmak (764) on Tuesday May 13 2014, @11:21AM (#42642)

    > I wonder if this chemical (and possibly others as yet undiscovered) are the reason that the sea was thought to have restorative powers

    Probably just the salt in the water. It kills certain kinds of bacteria.

    > However it really does seem to have the ability to somehow mitigate the shit thrown into it and remain (more or less) drinkable.

    Nah, that just sounds like hindu fundamentalism. Such denialism has been a major problem preventing the social outcry necessary to get the government there to start cleaning up the ganges. Kind of like how fundamentalist christians think god would never let humans harm the planet so global warming isn't anything to worry about.

    Fun fact: The word ganja comes from the name of the river, the correct pronunciation of ganges is very close to ganja (like gahn-gah).

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 13 2014, @12:02PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 13 2014, @12:02PM (#42659)

      fundamentalist christians think god would never let humans harm the planet

      Fundamentalist Christians don't believe in Free Will?

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 13 2014, @03:51PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 13 2014, @03:51PM (#42778)

        If it's in consideration of behavior they disapprove of, they do.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 13 2014, @09:05PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday May 13 2014, @09:05PM (#42916)

        > Fundamentalist Christians don't believe in Free Will?

        Not a matter of free will, a matter of ability, as in there is nothing that humans can do that would harm the planet. Same thing with the Ganges - nothing people can do will make it unclean because dharma.