A mathematical model that looked at the sudden collapse of empires or states was created, with an intent to look at why social disorder can appear from an apparently stable state (an example cited is the Arab Spring in 2011). Factions within a state make choices described by game-theory about whether to accept the political status quo, or to attempt to better their circumstances through costly rebellion.
We find that a small amount of dissatisfaction is typically harmless to the state, but can trigger sudden collapse when there is a sufficient buildup of political inequality. Contrary to intuition, a state is predicted to be least stable when its leadership is at the height of its political power and thus most able to exert its influence through external warfare, lavish expense or autocratic decree.
(Score: 2) by kaszz on Wednesday May 14 2014, @05:27PM
I suspect Russia may also be in that group. China too. One can see a pattern here. Big states with powerful military. I would say coherence built by force means built in momentum that can wreck things at the slightest mistake. And humans do fail.
The real question is when and where. And what will the consequences be? if more than one event collude by the nature of universe. Then things may take unpredicted turns out of control for anyone.