Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Thursday May 15 2014, @07:31AM   Printer-friendly
from the say-only-good-things dept.

From Ars Technica:

Imagine you just purchased a shiny new wireless router from Amazon, only to discover that the product doesn't work as you anticipated. To vent frustration and perhaps help others avoid the same mistake, you leave a negative product review-but some of your claims ultimately turn out to be incorrect or misleading. Now the company's attorneys want to sue you for your "illegal campaign to damage, discredit, defame, and libel" it. Are you going down in flames? Or can you say what you want on the Internet? As with many areas of law, the answers are nuanced and complicated. Our primer, however, will help you avoid the obvious pitfalls.

The article contains advice from defamation lawyer Lee Berlik and free speech attorney Paul Alan Levy.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by elf on Thursday May 15 2014, @10:21AM

    by elf (64) on Thursday May 15 2014, @10:21AM (#43677)

    The main difference between the US and UK used to be that you don't need to prove malice to prove to have been libel. In the UK things have change in the last year

    http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2013/26/conten ts/enacted>

    The type of defence you can used is clearly explained.

    The comments in ARS were actually quite interesting, what I said above was posted there.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by E_NOENT on Thursday May 15 2014, @01:38PM

    by E_NOENT (630) on Thursday May 15 2014, @01:38PM (#43706) Journal

    This is good advice. For me, I try to verify my assumption that anything I buy online (sight unseen) is going to be a worthless piece of junk until proven otherwise. I also count on the fact that reviews are often "gamed" by manufacturers and other paid shills.

    Negative reviews can be hokum as well (placed by competitors) but if you're at all familiar with type of product you're buying, you can spot the bogus false reviews and omit them from consideration.

    What's left (in the one-star ratings) are actual beefs that people have had with the product, which provide a pretty reliable guide toward whether or not it's worth your time. If I can't prove that the product is in fact a steaming pile, I'll begrudgingly purchase the item.

    Yeah, I *am* a lot of fun at parties, why do you ask?

    --
    I'm not in the business... I *am* the business.