Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Woods on Thursday May 15 2014, @09:52PM   Printer-friendly
from the coming-up-with-department-names-is-hard dept.

Anonymously spilling personal gossip and corporate secrets online is all fun and games-until someone gets a subpoena. Startups like Secret and Whisper have defined a buzzy new category of social media, attracting millions of users and tens of millions of dollars in venture capital investments with the promise of allowing anyone to communicate with anonymity. But when it comes to actually revealing corporate and government secrets -a "whistleblowing" function that the two services either implicitly or explicitly condone- users should read the fine print. For all their vaunted anonymity, both companies collect enough information to easily identify their secret-sharers, and both have exceptions written into their terms of service that allow them to rat out their private users at the first whiff of legal controversy.

http://www.wired.com/2014/05/whistleblowers-beware /

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by Ethanol-fueled on Friday May 16 2014, @02:29PM

    by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Friday May 16 2014, @02:29PM (#44199) Homepage

    I found it pretty hilarious that people actually believed that apps like Snapchat would actually keep their naked pics private, as if they couldn't just be captured with a screenshot app.

    Sweet Jesus, people are fucking dense.