Anonymously spilling personal gossip and corporate secrets online is all fun and games-until someone gets a subpoena. Startups like Secret and Whisper have defined a buzzy new category of social media, attracting millions of users and tens of millions of dollars in venture capital investments with the promise of allowing anyone to communicate with anonymity. But when it comes to actually revealing corporate and government secrets -a "whistleblowing" function that the two services either implicitly or explicitly condone- users should read the fine print. For all their vaunted anonymity, both companies collect enough information to easily identify their secret-sharers, and both have exceptions written into their terms of service that allow them to rat out their private users at the first whiff of legal controversy.
http://www.wired.com/2014/05/whistleblowers-beware /
(Score: 2) by tathra on Friday May 16 2014, @08:19PM
uh oh, this is a dupe of a story posted on /. today! why are we bothering to exist if all we do is continue to copy slashdot?! /sarcasm
seriously, those "this is a /. dupe!" comments are really annoying.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 17 2014, @06:34AM
What is this slashdot you mention?