SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the I'm-not-touching-this-with-a-ten-foot-pole dept.
The Guardian has a fascinating piece entitled Sexual paranoia on campus – and the professor at the eye of the storm. There is a lot going on in this article/interview and it touches on a lot of different issues in both society and higher-ed in general. Some choice quotes:
But you do end up making strange bedfellows. The people supporting free speech now are the conservatives. It's incomprehensible to me, but it's the so-called liberals on campus, the students who think of themselves as activists, who are becoming increasingly authoritarian. So I'm trying to step carefully. It's not like you want to make certain allies, particularly the men's rights people.
Kipnis's original essay was provoked by an email she received about a year before, informing her that relationships – dating, romantic or sexual – between undergraduates and faculty members at Northwestern were now banned. The same email informed her that relationships between graduates and staff, though not forbidden, were also problematic, and had to be reported to department chairs. "It annoyed me," she says. The language was neutral, but it seemed clear that it was mostly women this code was meant to protect. She thought of all those she knew who are married to former students, or who are the children of such couples, and wondered where this left them. It seemed to her this was part of a process that was transforming the "professoriate" into a sexually suspicious class: "would-be harassers all, sexual predators in waiting".
On a personal note, when I interact with students (which is every day), it's always either with an open office door, or in a public area. So as not to be discriminatory, I do the same for all students, men, women, or others. This sort of culture on campuses does make everyone suspicious of everyone else and it makes it hard to trust others. Students can't trust the instructors because they might "do something", staff can't trust the students because even a false accusation can be career ending, so there's this overall chilling effect that occurs when what should be a collegiate environment turns into an us vs them thing. This is definitely worse in some places than others, but there is an undercurrent of it everywhere. I applaud Laura Kipnis for bringing these issues to the light -- if we're going down this route, it should at least be a conscious community decision rather than bureaucratic policy handed down from University Counsel and risk assessment teams.
(Score: 2) by Thexalon on Friday April 14 2017, @02:14AM (1 child)
OK, so using your example, there are about 1,000 students at that college. That means no more than a couple hundred faculty at most. The college in question is in a county with about 16,000 residents, of which 45%, or roughly 7,000, are unmarried. (Yes, I'm assuming the faculty members of a rural area like this likely have access to a car.) Which means the population of single non-college folks is substantially higher than the population of students, and there's about 350 non-college single people per faculty member. So even if we assume that none of the faculty are married, there's at least as good odds they'll find a good connection with a non-college person than with a college person.
The only thing that stops a bad guy with a compiler is a good guy with a compiler.
(Score: 2) by fliptop on Friday April 14 2017, @12:16PM
You've obviously never been to Philippi.
To be oneself, and unafraid whether right or wrong, is more admirable than the easy cowardice of surrender to conformity