Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by on Thursday April 20 2017, @10:46AM   Printer-friendly
from the breaking-news dept.

Submitted via IRC for TheMightyBuzzard

Or 2018 if you're brave. For now, we have a boot screen!

Story's a bit dated but being as they're in no rush, I don't see any need for us to be either. So, you lot think we'll ever actually get to play with a VMS box on cheap hardware or is this going to be another DNF situation?

Source: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/10/13/openvms_moves_slowly_towards_x86/

Previous coverage:
OpenVMS Not Yet Dead.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday April 20 2017, @01:39PM (3 children)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday April 20 2017, @01:39PM (#496844) Journal
    VAX was one of my first lessons in the problems that can come with adding capabilities for incompetent parties. At one point while I was in school, I was offered access to a VAX system so locked down that you couldn't even list files by default. Fortunately, I had access to better Linux systems at the time and didn't have to fight that awful administration environment.

    VAX's ability to do detailed security allowances by file/command was interesting and powerful, but boy, can it be abused by the clueless!
  • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Friday April 21 2017, @02:44AM (2 children)

    by kaszz (4211) on Friday April 21 2017, @02:44AM (#497192) Journal

    Systems run by clueless people will always be a disadvantage to whoever has to endure them. The problem is clueless people, not software. Which in the modern era is solved by that even a handheld phone has more computing power than a early 1990s supercomputer (8*10^9 op/s).

    • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday April 21 2017, @02:53PM (1 child)

      by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday April 21 2017, @02:53PM (#497426) Journal
      Sure, but this level of clueless micromanagement would have been more difficult on most other systems. Incompetence negates capability.
      • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Friday April 21 2017, @03:16PM

        by kaszz (4211) on Friday April 21 2017, @03:16PM (#497441) Journal

        So true, no default micromanagement capability. Thwarting incompetence since dawn of mankind.. ;)