Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Thursday April 20 2017, @10:46AM   Printer-friendly
from the breaking-news dept.

Submitted via IRC for TheMightyBuzzard

Or 2018 if you're brave. For now, we have a boot screen!

Story's a bit dated but being as they're in no rush, I don't see any need for us to be either. So, you lot think we'll ever actually get to play with a VMS box on cheap hardware or is this going to be another DNF situation?

Source: https://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/10/13/openvms_moves_slowly_towards_x86/

Previous coverage:
OpenVMS Not Yet Dead.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Friday April 21 2017, @02:44AM (2 children)

    by kaszz (4211) on Friday April 21 2017, @02:44AM (#497192) Journal

    Systems run by clueless people will always be a disadvantage to whoever has to endure them. The problem is clueless people, not software. Which in the modern era is solved by that even a handheld phone has more computing power than a early 1990s supercomputer (8*10^9 op/s).

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Friday April 21 2017, @02:53PM (1 child)

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Friday April 21 2017, @02:53PM (#497426) Journal
    Sure, but this level of clueless micromanagement would have been more difficult on most other systems. Incompetence negates capability.
    • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Friday April 21 2017, @03:16PM

      by kaszz (4211) on Friday April 21 2017, @03:16PM (#497441) Journal

      So true, no default micromanagement capability. Thwarting incompetence since dawn of mankind.. ;)