Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by LaminatorX on Monday May 19 2014, @06:24AM   Printer-friendly

Raw Story summarizes a New York Times report that Colleges across the country this spring have been wrestling with student requests for what are known as "trigger warnings," explicit alerts that the material they are about to read or see in a classroom might upset them or, as some students assert, cause symptoms of post-traumatic stress disorder in victims of rape or in war veterans.

The debate has left many academics fuming, saying that professors should be trusted to use common sense and that being provocative is part of their mandate. Trigger warnings, they say, suggest a certain fragility of mind that higher learning is meant to challenge, not embrace. "Any kind of blanket trigger policy is inimical to academic freedom," said Lisa Hajjar, a sociology professor, who often uses graphic depictions of torture in her courses about war. "Any student can request some sort of individual accommodation, but to say we need some kind of one-size-fits-all approach is totally wrong. The presumption there is that students should not be forced to deal with something that makes them uncomfortable is absurd or even dangerous."

Greg Lukianoff, president of the Foundation for Individual Rights in Education, said, "It is only going to get harder to teach people that there is a real important and serious value to being offended. Part of that is talking about deadly serious and uncomfortable subjects."

A summary of the College Literature, along with the appropriate trigger warnings, assumed or suggested in the article is as follows: Shakespeare's "The Merchant of Venice" (anti-Semitism), Virginia Woolf's "Mrs. Dalloway" (suicide), "The Great Gatsby" (misogynistic violence), and "The Adventures of Huckleberry Finn" (racism).

Note: The Raw Story link was provided to provide an alternative to the article source, the New York Times, due to user complaints about the NYT website paywalling their articles.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by davester666 on Monday May 19 2014, @07:05AM

    by davester666 (155) on Monday May 19 2014, @07:05AM (#45108)

    Next up, better kill debate club, because the losing side will feel bad.

    Might as well just kill all debate on campus, because you never know when you might use an argument that will send the other person into a murderous rampage.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 2, Funny) by Horse With Stripes on Monday May 19 2014, @10:09AM

    by Horse With Stripes (577) on Monday May 19 2014, @10:09AM (#45148)

    Next up, better kill debate club, because the losing side will feel bad.

    Not if you give them "Everyone Who Participates is a Winner" ribbons or little trophies. Those make everyone feel better. BUT, you must provide a trigger warning "contains competition and inequitable distribution of accolades based on performance" to make sure everyone knows what they are getting in to.

  • (Score: 3, Funny) by tangomargarine on Monday May 19 2014, @02:30PM

    by tangomargarine (667) on Monday May 19 2014, @02:30PM (#45223)

    Might as well just kill all debate on campus, because you never know...

    Whoa, whoa! You didn't warn me that we were going to be talking about killing stuff. Now I'm traumatized.

    --
    "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
    • (Score: 1) by GrumblyStuff on Monday May 19 2014, @06:05PM

      by GrumblyStuff (4351) on Monday May 19 2014, @06:05PM (#45313)

      Balls to the debate club, I say. As TV pundits and presidential candidates have shown, "winning" debates is a matter of firing a barrage of short arguments at your opponent, each of which would require an explanation longer than the whole debate.

      • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Monday May 19 2014, @06:50PM

        by tangomargarine (667) on Monday May 19 2014, @06:50PM (#45327)

        My favorite instance was when we had a political debate on my college campus and someone stood up and asked, "Why does the Republican Party hate women?" Those were their exact words.

        --
        "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
  • (Score: 2) by tibman on Monday May 19 2014, @02:43PM

    by tibman (134) Subscriber Badge on Monday May 19 2014, @02:43PM (#45232)

    Do you think the same thing about epilepsy? Do you think something known to send people into epileptic shock should have a warning?

    I doubt this warning was suggested to prevent sad feelings. It was probably suggested to warn someone sensitive to extreme images. Overkill outside of an extreme, obviously. But i really question how someone sensitive to torture images would take a class on torture and not expect to see it, lol. Which makes the whole warning pointless.

    --
    SN won't survive on lurkers alone. Write comments.
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 19 2014, @04:57PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 19 2014, @04:57PM (#45288)

      I doubt this warning was suggested to prevent sad feelings. It was probably suggested to warn someone sensitive to extreme images. Overkill outside of an extreme, obviously. But i really question how someone sensitive to torture images would take a class on torture and not expect to see it, lol. Which makes the whole warning pointless.

      On the drive to work today I passed a van covered with graphic photos of a foetus which had been aborted at 26 weeks. Pretty graphic, actually. I was driving along and, without warning, there it was in traffic right in front of me. Shouldn't someone have given me a warning ahead of time? What do you think? Should I sue someone?

      • (Score: 3, Insightful) by zafiro17 on Monday May 19 2014, @05:20PM

        by zafiro17 (234) on Monday May 19 2014, @05:20PM (#45298) Homepage

        Any snowflake taking a university level course on human rights violations/torture who is unable to handle actually seeing pictures of actual torture, has made a strategic life choice error. If you can handle the pictures, you shouldn't be studying the subject. Go change majors and enjoy your new lifestyle studying something else, fer crying out loud.

        --
        Dad always thought laughter was the best medicine, which I guess is why several of us died of tuberculosis - Jack Handey
      • (Score: 2) by tibman on Monday May 19 2014, @08:00PM

        by tibman (134) Subscriber Badge on Monday May 19 2014, @08:00PM (#45351)

        Unfortunately, warnings are often done as a courtesy and not a legal requirement. They should probably remain that way as well. So even though you were grossed out and didn't want to see that image, it was their right to display it. Discourteous, for sure.

        The more common version of this is participating in an image board where shock images are not banned (free speech). You're going along and reading some comics then bam! goatse taking up a huge part of your display.. staring right back at you.

        --
        SN won't survive on lurkers alone. Write comments.
  • (Score: 2) by umafuckitt on Monday May 19 2014, @07:48PM

    by umafuckitt (20) on Monday May 19 2014, @07:48PM (#45347)

    You joke, but I think you're on to something. Mockery is the best way of dealing with this stuff. We should all start petitioning for random crap, like your debate idea, to become part of higher education.