Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday May 19 2014, @11:51AM   Printer-friendly
from the updates-got-you-down? dept.

Woody Leonhard of Infoworld summarizes the current state of Microsoft KB 2919355, the ambiguously-titled 'Windows 8.1 Update' (not to be confused with the update _to_ Windows 8.1).

In short: Microsoft has frozen two discussion threads on KB2919355 issues (after 103 and 116 pages of comments), and updated the Knowledge Base article with workarounds for seven major errors... some of which don't work.

In last week's Patch Tuesday, Microsoft changed their deadline for this Update until June (formerly they were requiring all Windows 8.1 and Server 2012 systems worldwide to have installed the Update in order to receive new patches).

Meanwhile, if you run a WSUS server, you may notice that the package for KB291355 (last reissued for the third time on 6 May) was apparently silently reissued over the weekend with a new release date of '15 May 2014', but there's no indication of any software updates in the KB article. The article revision number, however, now stands at '21.0'. Yes, twenty-one revisions. With no changelog.

Anyone else with interesting stories about your deployment issues with this Update?

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by crutchy on Tuesday May 20 2014, @08:47AM

    by crutchy (179) on Tuesday May 20 2014, @08:47AM (#45537) Homepage Journal

    you seem to be implying that windows 8.1 requires an SSD to be usable

    i doubt your microsoft handlers would approve of that :-P

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by cubancigar11 on Tuesday May 20 2014, @10:27AM

    by cubancigar11 (330) on Tuesday May 20 2014, @10:27AM (#45550) Homepage Journal

    That is why I installed it.

    > i doubt your microsoft handlers would approve of that :-P :D We aren't THAT famous yet.