SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
The Liberal premier of Ontario announced details of the Ontario Basic Income Pilot. The provincial government issued a press release saying
Three regions will take part in the study. Pilots will start in late spring in Hamilton, including Brantford and Brant County; and in Thunder Bay and the surrounding area. The third pilot will start by this fall [autumn] in Lindsay.
The Basic Income model Ontario has developed will ensure that eligible participants receive:
Up to $16,989 per year for a single person, less 50 per cent of any earned income
Up to $24,027 per year for a couple, less 50 per cent of any earned income
Up to an additional $6,000 per year for a person with a disability.
[...] The three test regions will host 4,000 participants eligible to receive a basic income payment, between the ages of 18 to 64. By late spring, people in these areas will begin receiving information about the pilot and how to participate. The province is partnering with these communities and other experts to make sure that the Ontario Basic Income Pilot is fair, effective, and scientifically valid.
additional coverage:
- Canoe (editorial)
- The Globe and Mail
- globalnews.ca
- The Guardian
- Business Insider
- BBC News
- Canadian Press via City News
- Reuters via NASDAQ
- Toronto Star
- CHCH-TV
- CBC
- CNN Money
related story:
Ontario is Starting a Universal Basic Income Pilot
(Score: 2) by rondon on Monday May 01 2017, @02:00PM
I didn't define living wage, you just assumed that I did. I simply proposed it as a variable. Since you seem pretty hung up on it, lets define it as enough money to feed, house, and clothe two persons (yourself, and one child) along with transportation for one to work. This transportation could be bus, a horse, a car; whatever you want that is cost effective for the distance traveled.
Also, I never said gratis. I never backed any type of basic income or welfare. I specifically mentioned workfare, in fact.
I also never assumed the number of jobs was "fixed." However, at any given point in time there are X number of people and Y number of jobs. That is simply a fact. My question is, if X is substantially greater than Y, what is your solution. My long term fear is that automation is driving our society towards a state where the demand for jobs is greater than the demand for the output from those jobs, which would seem to lead to the situation where X is greater than Y.
BTW Jmo, I have moved for work. I have taken a job outside my chosen field of study. I have done what I consider necessary to reach my definition of success. My concern is for those less fortunate than myself, and those who come after me who won't can't follow the same route I did due to the work I have done automating in my field. Your questions to me quickly display the broad brush you use to paint everyone who even so much as asks you a question.