The campaign staff of Emmanuel Macron, one of the two candidates in France's presidential election run-off, claim to have been targeted by a massive hacking operation that leaked sensitive documents:
On the eve of the most consequential French presidential election in decades, the staff of the centrist candidate Emmanuel Macron said late Friday that the campaign had been targeted by a "massive and coordinated" hacking operation, one with the potential to destabilize the nation's democracy before voters go to the polls on Sunday.
The digital attack, which involved a dump of campaign documents including emails and accounting records, emerged hours before a legal prohibition on campaign communications went into effect. While the leak may be of little consequence, the timing makes it extremely difficult for Mr. Macron to mitigate any damaging fallout before the runoff election, in which he faces the far-right candidate Marine Le Pen, who has pledged to pull France out of the euro and hold a referendum to leave the European Union.
French authorities recently arrested a suspect who admitted to attacking the campaign website for the other candidate, Marine Le Pen.
Also at the Washington Post, CNN, BBC, and Reuters.
(Score: 2) by butthurt on Sunday May 07 2017, @02:09AM
I'm going to assume that you're being sarcastic. I'm also going to assume that the "wrongdoing" you're referring to is not the break-in, but something Mr. Macron or his party supposedly did that has come to light because of this attack. The article says:
“It will take to time to sift through it all, but at first glance, they seem to be utterly mundane,” Numerama said after analyzing the data.
Assuming some of the leaked documents are real, En Marche! (Macron's party) should have taken better care of its data. Are you saying that that rises to the level of "wrongdoing"? If not, what's the wrongdoing on the part of En Marche! or Macron?