Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Thursday May 11 2017, @12:36PM   Printer-friendly
from the what-security-issue? dept.

Microsoft's only choice to move forward is to throw the Win32 baby out with the bathwater. And that brings us to the introduction of Windows 10 S.

Windows 10 S is just like the Windows 10 you use now, but the main difference is it can only run apps that have been whitelisted to run in the Windows Store. That means, by and large, existing Win32-based stuff cannot run in Windows 10 S for security reasons.

To bridge the app gap, Microsoft is allowing certain kinds of desktop apps to be "packaged" for use in the Windows Store through a tooling process known as Desktop Bridge or Project Centennial.

The good news is that with Project Centennial, many Desktop Win32 apps can be re-purposed and packaged to take advantage of Windows 10's improved security. However, there are apps that will inevitably be left behind because they violate the sandboxing rules that are needed to make the technology work in a secure fashion.

"A casualty of those sandboxing rules is Google's Chrome browser. For security reasons, Microsoft is not permitting desktop browsers to be ported to the Store."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by idiot_king on Thursday May 11 2017, @06:03PM (5 children)

    by idiot_king (6587) on Thursday May 11 2017, @06:03PM (#508215)

    You are clearly repurposing the plight of literally billions of women over the years to troll for comments. Misogyny and sexism are NOT jokes, and they are NOT tools to be used by people like you to gain leverage over others.
    Please don't be so vain, or at least transparent, about it.
    The usual rule applies here: places like 4chan are for trolling, not SN. Keep it there.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 11 2017, @08:04PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 11 2017, @08:04PM (#508285)

    The usual rule applies here: places like 4chan are for trolling, not SN. Keep it there.

    Ha! You must be new around here.

    Freedom of (legal, that won't get the site shut down or the management arrested/sued) speech is the rule here.

    So don't STFU. Say whatever you want. But understand that the moderation system generally does a pretty good job with the trolls.

    Browse at +1 or +2 and you'll never see it.

    I'm not a fan of trolls, but they have as much right to be here as you. Given your attitudes toward silencing speech you don't like, I'd rather read a troll post.

  • (Score: 0, Flamebait) by kurenai.tsubasa on Thursday May 11 2017, @10:14PM

    by kurenai.tsubasa (5227) on Thursday May 11 2017, @10:14PM (#508360) Journal

    You are clearly repurposing the plight of literally billions of women over the years to troll for comments.

    Where did I do this?

    Misogyny and sexism are NOT jokes, and they are NOT tools to be used by people like you to gain leverage over others.

    Who am I gaining leverage over?

    What about this quote from a feminist [wikipedia.org]?

    All transsexuals rape women's bodies by reducing the real female form to an artifact, appropriating this body for themselves .... Transsexuals merely cut off the most obvious means of invading women, so that they seem non-invasive.

    Who is using the issue of rape to gain leverage over whom here? That is a feminist talking about my own goddamned body.

    Women are underrepresented in programming jobs, and that does make me sad. However, the approach feminism has chosen, which is to lay the blame for this problem at the feet of half the planet's population (over 3.5 billion and counting) and only their feet makes me livid. When feminism also seeks bathroom laws and to paint every trans woman as a bathroom rapist in the media, that makes me an excessive amount of rage. Not only is the problem my fault, it's even more my fault because I'm trans, and I don't count as a woman anyway to feminists. Not only do they reduce my body to a piece of “leverage” as you put it and a sexual object, but they have the goddamned fucking gall to tell me what I'm thinking as a sexual object and to tell me what my sexual orientation is over all demonstrable evidence of actual people I've bumped nasties with in bed.

    Unlike “male feminists,” I'm not posting for the purpose of luring womyn-born-womyn in for sexual assault. I'm not talking about the barriers womyn-born-womyn face in programming careers because I think it'll get laid me. I am attracted to men exclusively, thank you very much. And it frankly pisses me the fuck off that feminism gives these goddamned assholes who have devoted so much time and energy to throwing every other assigned male in a programming job (including trans women like me, and yes, this has happened to me PERSONALLY, FACE TO FUCKING FACE) under the fucking bus a pass when they are out committing actual fucking rape-rape or whatever the fuck you want to call it.

    Look dude, I don't need to recount every last incident I've had where I've endured sexual harassment and even molestation from womyn-born-womyn. Nobody would want to read it, and if my post up there is tl;dr, holy shit!

    And here's Microsoft!!!!!!! Here's fucking Microsoft! If a woman has a copy of Windows 7 installed or even Windows 8, I can help her install a Python environment so she can get started. Once Microsoft is done with their shit, if somebody wants to learn programming, they WILL need to install Linux (or BSD or whatever) if they cannot afford the M$ tax. After my ex-parents threw me out (which they likely would have done anyway if I'd been cisfemale and insistent on learning something like programming), there is NO FUCKING WAY I would have afforded a M$ tax, especially a goddamned SaaS subscription!

    Do you have any fucking idea what kind of barrier to entry that will create? Do you?

    NO YOU DON'T. YOU DON'T GIVE A SHIT ABOUT ACTUALLY SOLVING THIS PROBLEM, DO YOU?! ALL YOU WANT TO DO IS GO BACK TO THAT QUOTE FROM JANICE RAYMOND AND ACT LIKE I'M THE GODDAMNED PROBLEM HERE, JUST BECAUSE I'M NOT BEING A FUCKING SEX OBJECT FOR YOUR HUNNIES!

    But you know what? I don't try to do anything about this problem any more other than bitching on SN. You know why? Because of rapists like the one we had a story about the other day I linked to have convinced YOU that anybody assigned the male gender at birth NO MATTER WHAT FUCKING BODY PARTS THEY HAVE, NO MATTER THEIR LIVED GENDER who programs computers is a rapist. It does not matter how many of you goddamned feminists/white knights are PROVEN IN COURT TO BE RAPISTS. You have convinced the world that ANY assigned male who is upset about being reduced to HER (the assigned male's own) body parts, and not even her actual body parts, THE FUCKING BODY PARTS YOU JUST PRESUME SHE HAS must be the problem. And if they want to help, THEY'RE EVEN MORE OF A PROBLEM.

    SO FUCK YOU.

  • (Score: 4, Informative) by kurenai.tsubasa on Thursday May 11 2017, @10:40PM (2 children)

    by kurenai.tsubasa (5227) on Thursday May 11 2017, @10:40PM (#508374) Journal

    I'm not done yet.

    Do you even remember the bad old days when if you wanted to write an application for Windows 3.11, you needed to buy a $500 or $1,000 (1990s dollars to boot) book set and compiler?

    How fucking ignorant are you? This is that all over again, but it's even worse. Because of Digital Restrictions Management and UEFI lockdown, there's going to be no DJGPP this time around! Do you even know what DJGPP is? If not, you can go fuck yourself, because you're not qualified to be in this discussion.

    And look at you. You're running through the exact same goddamned script that feminists and white knights run through. Here's a person who's been victimized by sexist policies and even molested who is angry at being blamed for the lack of female computer programmers TO HER FUCKING FACE IN REAL FUCKING LIFE. Here's a person whose access to medical care has been fucked with before by feminists as revenge for something that was caused by OBAMACARE! I HAVE TO DRIVE OVER 300 MILES ROUND TRIP TO SEE A DOCTOR BECAUSE OF FEMINIST TRANSPHOBIA. Here's a person who IS a woman, BUT DOES NOT COUNT AS A WOMAN IN YOUR SOLE JUDGEMENT.

    But nope, here's the projection!

    You are clearly repurposing the plight of literally billions of women over the years to troll for comments.

    Apparently, somebody setting up a fake porn company and deceiving women for sex is a better person than I am!

    Fuck you, fuck you, fuck you. And fuck you. And how many women have you raped lately? How many pussies have you grabbed lately? Why don't you try grabbing my pussy (because if you saw me you'd think I have one) so that when you feel an overgrown clit instead I can just knee you in the junk!

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 12 2017, @05:29AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 12 2017, @05:29AM (#508494)

      There are PLENTY of articles on this site about feminism. Why does it have to be brought up in this article? This one is about walled gardens, wouldn't it create better discourse to stay on that topic?

    • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Friday May 12 2017, @02:59PM

      by tangomargarine (667) on Friday May 12 2017, @02:59PM (#508640)

      You said you weren't going to talk about gender stuff, spent one paragraph on the technical question, then rambled for 8 more about gender stuff.

      Just because we don't want to hear you turn every conversation into one about gender doesn't mean we actually disagree with you, either.

      --
      "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"