Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by LaminatorX on Friday February 21 2014, @10:30AM   Printer-friendly
from the Nations-Spying-on-Authors dept.

fleg writes:

"The Guardian is reporting that while the author of The Snowden Files was writing it, paragraphs started self-deleting."

From the article:

By September the book was going well - 30,000 words done. A Christmas deadline loomed. I was writing a chapter on the NSA's close, and largely hidden, relationship with Silicon Valley. I wrote that Snowden's revelations had damaged US tech companies and their bottom line. Something odd happened. The paragraph I had just written began to self-delete. The cursor moved rapidly from the left, gobbling text. I watched my words vanish. When I tried to close my OpenOffice file the keyboard began flashing and bleeping.

[ED Note: Some of author's claims are of course unverifiable, but his insiders view of the early days of the story are interesting even so.]

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Insightful) by bucc5062 on Friday February 21 2014, @11:56AM

    by bucc5062 (699) on Friday February 21 2014, @11:56AM (#4251)
    Cleaners were banned. Soon the room grew unkempt. Discarded sandwich packets and dirty coffee cups piled up.

    How hard is it to clean now and then. Is there some cool factor to pointing out that "hey guys, we're slobs". I wonder if the cleaned themselves or did they enjoy the stench of sweaty humans living out some Suspense novelists wet dream. On one hand I am grateful to Edward and the Guardian for shining the light on some ugly activities by the NSA (and our Congress). Of course, people got to make a buck and Greenwald is slurping, nay gulping from the trough.

    This article was Clancy on a bad day. I think he would have deleted most of it and started over. Hell, even if that happened to me^H^H^H^H^H, wait, what just happ...@#$h#
    --
    The more things change, the more they look the same
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +4  
       Insightful=2, Informative=1, Funny=1, Total=4
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 1) by LaminatorX on Friday February 21 2014, @12:17PM

    by LaminatorX (14) <reversethis-{moc ... ta} {xrotanimal}> on Friday February 21 2014, @12:17PM (#4259)

    Now I really wish I'd let the ED Note trail off mid sentence.

  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Open4D on Friday February 21 2014, @02:46PM

    by Open4D (371) on Friday February 21 2014, @02:46PM (#4330) Journal

    Of course, people got to make a buck and Greenwald is slurping, nay gulping from the trough.

    Well, Greenwald is presumably doing okay out of the whole affair [theguardian.com], but in this case I would say it's this "Snowden Files" book by Luke Harding that is probably most guilty of sensationalism / bandwagon-jumping / fast-buck-making. And TFA doesn't pretend to be anything other than a plug for the book.