Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday May 18 2017, @09:28PM   Printer-friendly
from the I-owe,-I-owe,-it's-off-to-work-I-go dept.

Another day, another record broken.

The debt held by US households has surpassed its pre-2008 record, several financial outlets note. A peculiar spotlight in the associated numbers falls on student loans, where delinquencies are multiple times higher than for other debt types: 10 percent is the norm.

That's some pretty troubling news for the economy [and wider society], notes Rana Foroohar at sister outlet the Financial Times. First off, there's the association between the rise in student debt, and a decrease in home ownership for young people. This connection is exacerbated by them millennials increasingly turning towards income-based repayment programmes, which spread out the debt over more years.

Secondly, the level of student debt delinquencies ain't changing: the 10 percent figure is a near-constant over the past 4-5 years. People who've ever had a delinquency -- even if they recover -- have a much lower rate of home ownership at age 30 as compared to their non-defaulted compatriots. Not having a home means not filling it with stuff, and filling with stuff is kinda what the economy is based on.

Then, thirdly, it's not only students that are hit by student debt: increasingly, their parents are taking on debt too, to help out. Fuel for that debt sandwich is something peculiar: the rate of inflation in college admission costs is three times higher than the consumer price index. Must be that college professors wages have increased a lot, then.

Given that boomers and their millennial offspring are the two largest voting blocks in the US, a snappy future president-elect might consider raising the issue a bit.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Saturday May 20 2017, @02:08PM (1 child)

    by kaszz (4211) on Saturday May 20 2017, @02:08PM (#512613) Journal

    It means you can earn money to save up for something. But the people that are willing to sign away their future can always come up with more money from the bank. This scheme works as long as the seller accepts the bank currency.

    People will use their high salary to compete on how much the bank is willing to loan them to bid on property that sells for more money than it's actually worth. The end winner is the bank.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Saturday May 20 2017, @03:53PM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Saturday May 20 2017, @03:53PM (#512629) Journal

    It means you can earn money to save up for something. But the people that are willing to sign away their future can always come up with more money from the bank. This scheme works as long as the seller accepts the bank currency.

    I'm still unclear on why you seem to think this is a problem or insisted it was the bank doing the outdoing. For a business, loans reduce cash flow problems. A tomato farmer who is more competent, has better farm equipment, better location, etc would also have advantages. But we wouldn't say that a tractor manufacturer, providing the better farm equipment, is outdoing the farmer who doesn't have that equipment.

    People will use their high salary to compete on how much the bank is willing to loan them to bid on property that sells for more money than it's actually worth. The end winner is the bank.

    So what? Nobody is forced to play that game. And bad decisions tend to be their own cure here.

    Also, this is a great way to transfer wealth from the people with high salaries to others. Banks take a cut, but the wealth doesn't all go to the bank.