Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Friday May 19 2017, @02:14AM   Printer-friendly
from the stop-snitching dept.

Submitted via IRC for TheMightyBuzzard

There are all sorts of different ways that websites that allow comments have dealt with trollish behavior over the years, but I think the BBC's new policy is the first I've seen in which the organization threatens that it may contact your boss or your school (found via Frank Fisher).

The new policy has a short section on "offensive or inappropriate content on BBC websites" where it says the following:

Offensive or inappropriate content on BBC websites

If you post or send offensive, inappropriate or objectionable content anywhere on or to BBC websites or otherwise engage in any disruptive behaviour on any BBC service, the BBC may use your personal information to stop such behaviour.

Where the BBC reasonably believes that you are or may be in breach of any applicable laws (e.g. because content you have posted may be defamatory), the BBC may use your personal information to inform relevant third parties such as your employer, school email/internet provider or law enforcement agencies about the content and your behaviour.

To be fair, it does seem to limit this to cases where it believes you've violated the law, but even so, it seems like a stretch to argue that the BBC should be calling your boss to tell on you for being a [troll], even if you break the law.

Source: TechDirt


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 19 2017, @02:44AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 19 2017, @02:44AM (#511962)

    double fuck the social justice warrior who calls herself a "human relations" officer

    So, company whore?

  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Friday May 19 2017, @03:01AM (1 child)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Friday May 19 2017, @03:01AM (#511978) Journal

    Mmmmmm - uhhhhh -

    That's a tough question. I don't think she whores herself at all. She is a BELIEVER!! You can't sell yourself for an idea that you believe in. Besides, she's almost the definition of "fugly", so she would have a hard time prostituting herself.

    So, no, I don't suppose she's any kind of a whore.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 19 2017, @06:56PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 19 2017, @06:56PM (#512301)

      I believe you are overthinking this. The emphasis should be placed on the "human relations" part of the job description to get the joke. As far the part about her being fugly, perhaps she is in fact a he. That seems to be a common thread among SJW advocates who claim femalehood these days. Is "her" name Caitlin or maybe L-O-L-A Lola?