Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Friday May 19 2017, @07:23AM   Printer-friendly
from the and-a-bottle-of-rum dept.

Submitted via IRC for TheMightyBuzzard

Ah, Denuvo; the anti-tamper tech that a lot of gamers hate. And while some people may claim that this attitude comes from the fact that the games powered by it are hard to crack, the latest triple-A game powered by it, PREY, has already been cracked.

While it did not break the record for the fastest Denuvo-powered game cracked, it’s a real surprise that the latest, and more powerful, version of the Denuvo is unable to protect these games for more than ten days.

For what it’s worth, Resident Evil VII remains the fastest cracked Denuvo-powered game as it was cracked in just five days, while Mass Effect: Andromeda is close to PREY as it was cracked in ten – more or less – days.

Source: Dark Side of Gaming


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Friday May 19 2017, @03:12PM (3 children)

    by tangomargarine (667) on Friday May 19 2017, @03:12PM (#512215)

    For some things there is no reasonable middle ground, e.g. "How much sewage would you be okay with me putting in your drinking water? A gallon? A cup? A drop?" Presumably that was his point.

    --
    "Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 20 2017, @02:54AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 20 2017, @02:54AM (#512504)

    I think you missed the point that Cuban's most recent point is that AC missed the point, and everybody needs to actually go and read that comment instead of circle-jerk-knee-jerking to a sentence introducing a much more nuanced idea.

    Personally I did read past the first sentence, and I thought that Cuban made a fair point. A++++ would read again.

    I mean, isn't that the point???

    If not... what's the point?

    (This must be why old men don't bother with making points. There's no point.)

  • (Score: 2) by cubancigar11 on Sunday May 21 2017, @04:29AM (1 child)

    by cubancigar11 (330) on Sunday May 21 2017, @04:29AM (#512877) Homepage Journal

    That is one position, which is a valid position. Yet there are people who don't care about owning anything digitally and would rather perpetually rent it. For example, I know people who don't plan to own a house ever. Or a better example - I know people who don't care about the source code of the software they use. Does catering to those people an inherently bad thing?

    • (Score: 1) by anubi on Sunday May 21 2017, @05:39AM

      by anubi (2828) on Sunday May 21 2017, @05:39AM (#512898) Journal

      Oh crap... I hit the wrong "reply" button.

      Here's where it went. [soylentnews.org]

      --
      "Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]