If millions of people know something, can it really be considered a secret anymore? That’s one of the questions at the heart of an ongoing debate in Washington about how much, and which, documents to classify in the age of Wikileaks, iPhones, and Edward Snowden.
That challenge, underscored by Mr. Snowden’s leaks of details exposing the National Security Agency’s top-secret surveillance programs, has given transparency experts new hope that they can help intelligence agencies take advantage of new thinking around classification to ensure that what needs to be secret stays secret.
“The calculation has changed recently, because a single individual, either out of negligence or malice or some other motive, can disclose whole libraries of records,” says Steven Aftergood, director of the Federation of American Scientists’ Project on Government Secrecy. “That’s something the government has not yet figured out how to deter or prevent.”
(Score: 2) by idiot_king on Saturday May 27 2017, @02:26AM (1 child)
No individual is truly "private" except for hermits.
The government needs to shield itself from outsiders in the same manner you don't live in a crystal glass house nor publish your bank account to your friends (unless you have no sense of decency, which is not uncommon for SN regulars).
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 27 2017, @03:27AM
As usual.