If millions of people know something, can it really be considered a secret anymore? That’s one of the questions at the heart of an ongoing debate in Washington about how much, and which, documents to classify in the age of Wikileaks, iPhones, and Edward Snowden.
That challenge, underscored by Mr. Snowden’s leaks of details exposing the National Security Agency’s top-secret surveillance programs, has given transparency experts new hope that they can help intelligence agencies take advantage of new thinking around classification to ensure that what needs to be secret stays secret.
“The calculation has changed recently, because a single individual, either out of negligence or malice or some other motive, can disclose whole libraries of records,” says Steven Aftergood, director of the Federation of American Scientists’ Project on Government Secrecy. “That’s something the government has not yet figured out how to deter or prevent.”
(Score: 2) by Wootery on Monday May 29 2017, @05:52PM
So I guess the CIA should open their books for public scrutiny, right? And police departments should publish lists of their undercover agents?
Ugh. I'm terrible at ignoring trolls. I really have to wonder if SoylentNews would be better off without ACs. It's awfully rare for them to post anything of value.
Which muppet gave this nonsense +1 Insightful?