Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday May 27 2017, @12:03AM   Printer-friendly
from the good+fast+cheap? dept.

Intel is planning to make the Thunderbolt specification royalty-free, and include support for the protocol on its CPUs rather than on external chips:

Intel's dream of making one cable to rule them all took a huge step forward this week. On Wednesday, Intel announced it will integrate Thunderbolt 3 into future CPUs. More importantly, the company said it would open up the long-secret protocol to the world, royalty-free. The company's explanation for the change is practically utopian. "Intel's vision for Thunderbolt was not just to make a faster computer port, but a simpler and more versatile port available to everyone," wrote Chris Walker, Intel's vice president for Client Computing, in a blog post.

[...] By moving Thunderbolt onto the CPU, Intel says it can lower the cost and the power requirements. Intel didn't actually detail which CPUs would get Thunderbolt 3 or when. If it's truly coming to all of them, it would mean every PC that uses an Intel chip would get the much sought-after feature. There's no fear of a proprietary lock now, either. "In addition to Intel's (CPU integrated) Thunderbolt silicon," Walker wrote, "next year Intel plans to make the Thunderbolt protocol specification available to the industry under a nonexclusive, royalty-free license."

Here's an idea: take the Intel Management Engine off at the same time.

Also at BusinessInsider, Wired, CNET, Tom's Hardware, and Ars Technica.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 27 2017, @11:15PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 27 2017, @11:15PM (#516555)

    Remember in the 90s when everyone was going nuts collecting fonts? No one does that anymore; they just use whatever's installed

    When a website includes JavaScript and won't work without those scripts (and the site looks like it might actually contain something interesting), I hand the URL to archive.li.
    That site will run the scripts and show the resulting page.

    I find that the same web developers who use scripts to do basic content on their pages also include webfonts as part of their pages--typically by the dozen.
    I block anything with "font" or "fnt" in its URL.

    Again, archive.li takes the bandwidth hit associated with those, listing them as it downloads them, and rendering the result.

    So, you may not have a bunch of fonts as part of your OS install but, if you're a typical web user, you're constantly using new fonts and having to download those--and having to waste bandwidth on them yet again after you have flushed your browser's cache.

    -- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]