From the RooshV Forum:
I constantly get the vibe from people that they think our technology is skyrocketing, that we're living in a new tech age, "where was all this ten years ago?!" etc.
But I disagree with this assessment of our technology. It has made steady improvements in one specific space: software and electronic hardware. That is all. On top of that, the improvements on the hardware have not even been ground breaking. GPS is a ground-breaking invention. Smaller screens are not: they are just an incremental improvement.
Smartphones are merely the result of incremental improvements in the size and quality of electronic components. The only breakthroughs involved are ages old. The invention of the transistor, the laser, etc. The existence of google, facebook, uber, and so on, are merely inevitable "new applications" stemming from these improvements. They are not breakthroughs, they are merely improvements and combinations upon the telephone, the directory, and the taxi.
In my opinion, technology as a whole is borderline stagnant.
A list of why technology is still shit:
The posting goes on to list examples of incremental, rather than breakthrough, changes in the areas of:
Have we really stagnated? Have we already found all of the "low-hanging fruit", so new breakthroughs are harder to find? Maybe there is greater emphasis on changes that are immediately able to be commercialized and less emphasis on basic research?
(Score: 4, Interesting) by Anal Pumpernickel on Monday May 29 2017, @11:05PM
Our tech is shit, but I don't agree with all the reasoning here. We are surrounded by computers, and the vast majority of them run software that deny users their freedoms and even outright abuse them by spying and limiting what users can do (DRM); they are essentially black boxes. The tech industry is deeply unethical; it has no problems with proprietary software, conducting mass surveillance, and just generally abusing users to make a buck. Worst of all, most useds don't even know or care about any of this, so it looks like we're doomed.
So the problem with tech is hardly that it's not futuristic enough; there are far more fundamental problems than that. People who only or even mostly focus on usability are missing the point.