Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Wednesday June 07 2017, @07:23AM   Printer-friendly
from the as-much-as-you're-willing-to-pay dept.

At least one national insurer, AAA, is raising rates on Tesla vehicles based on data showing that the Model S and Model X had abnormally high claim frequencies and high costs of insurance claims compared with other cars in the same classes.

AAA said premiums for Tesla vehicles could go up 30 percent based on data from the Highway Loss Data Institute and other sources.

Tesla is disputing the analysis.

"This analysis is severely flawed and is not reflective of reality," the electric-vehicle maker said in a statement emailed to Automotive News. "Among other things, it compares Model S and X to cars that are not remotely peers, including even a Volvo station wagon."

Anthony Ptasznik, chief actuary of AAA, said the group noticed the anomaly in company data and then investigated other data sources, primarily relying on the Highway Loss Data Institute because of its scope, to confirm its analysis. "Looking at a much broader set of countrywide data, we saw the same patterns observed in our own data, and that gave us the confidence to change rates," he said.

Other large insurance companies, including State Farm and Geico, said that claims data is a major factor in calculating premiums, but would not disclose if their Tesla-owning customers would also see rates rise.

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by AthanasiusKircher on Wednesday June 07 2017, @05:20PM

    by AthanasiusKircher (5291) on Wednesday June 07 2017, @05:20PM (#522073) Journal

    I've done some of your work for you, since I'm legitimately curious about this story (which I guess I missed when it happened years ago).

    Here's Musk's account [tesla.com] and criticisms, including lots of graphs.
    Here's a point-by-point rebuttal [nytimes.com] by the reporter, including explanations that he was advised by Tesla personnel to do certain things that Musk then criticized him for.
    And here's a Times editor [nytimes.com] commenting on what happened, along with an extended quote from a reader's reaction.
    And the tow truck driver [jalopnik.com], who didn't seem to think the Times reporter was "faking" an incident.
    And yes, other Tesla owners could make the trip [greencarreports.com], though they didn't recreate the cold night, and it wasn't without incident. (One car wouldn't accept a full charge at a Delaware station, which then caused other cars to be unable to charge properly there, which required calls to Tesla support and pushing new software to fix it.)

    Sounds like a bad story, a reporter that was perhaps careless, and a bunch of nonsense dithering with Musk over driving stats. Imprecision in reporting, coupled with an overreaction by Musk that apparently fails to acknowledge most of the reporter's behavior was sanctioned by Tesla. Unless you want to claim that the calls made to Tesla about his drive, during his tow, etc. never happened either.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=1, Informative=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4