Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Sunday June 11 2017, @06:36PM   Printer-friendly
from the just-look-at-the-comments-below dept.

NASA chief scientist weighs in

Americans are "under siege" from disinformation designed to confuse the public about the threat of climate change, Nasa's former chief scientist has said.

Speaking to the Guardian, Ellen Stofan, who left the US space agency in December, said that a constant barrage of half-truths had left many Americans oblivious to the potentially dire consequences of continued carbon emissions, despite the science being unequivocal.

"We are under siege by fake information that's being put forward by people who have a profit motive," she said, citing oil and coal companies as culprits. "Fake news is so harmful because once people take on a concept it's very hard to dislodge it."

During the past six months, the US science community has woken up to this threat, according to Stofan, and responded by ratcheting up efforts to communicate with the public at the grassroots level as well as in the mainstream press.

"The harder part is this active disinformation campaign," she said before her appearance at Cheltenham Science Festival this week. "I'm always wondering if these people honestly believe the nonsense they put forward. When they say 'It could be volcanoes' or 'the climate always changes'... to obfuscate and to confuse people, it frankly makes me angry."

Stofan added that while "fake news" is frequently characterised as a problem in the right-leaning media, she saw evidence of an "erosion of people's ability to scrutinise information" across the political spectrum. "All of us have a responsibility," she said. "There's this attitude of 'I read it on the internet therefore it must be true'."

No editorial comment included.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 11 2017, @09:16PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 11 2017, @09:16PM (#523945)

    There's a lot of parties in Sweden that too few people vote for:

    De nya svenskarna (DPNS)
            Direktdemokraterna
            Djurens parti (DjuP)
            Djurägarpartiet (Däp)
            Enhet (ENH)
            Europeiska arbetarpartiet (EAP)
            Feministiskt initiativ (F!/FI/Fi) - har ett mandat i Europaparlamentet
            Framstegspartiet
            Fredsdemokraterna
            Frihetliga rättvisepartiet (FRP)
            Gula partiet (Gup)
            Humandemokraterna (HumDe)
            Hälsopartiet
            Högerpartiet de konservativa
            Klassiskt liberala partiet (KLP)
            Kristna värdepartiet (KrVP)
            Landsbygdspartiet oberoende (LBPO)
            Nya partiet
            Piratpartiet (PP)
            Reformist neutral partiet (RNP)
            Republikanerna
            Rättvisepartiet socialisterna (RS)
            Skånepartiet (SKÅ)
            SPI Välfärden (SPI)
            Svenskarnas parti (SvP)
            Sveriges kommunistiska parti (SKP)
            Vägvalet (VägV)
            Borgerlig framtid, 2014
            Cannabispartiet
            Försvarspartiet
            Gröna partiet
            Medborgerlig Samling
            Ny framtid
            Partiet de fria
            Riktiga Sverige
            Socialliberalerna
            Spritpartiet
            Steg 3
            Sverigesmultidemokrater

    To eliminate ignorant votes. One could have three questions on the ballot with multiple tick boxes which is then OCR scanned. Only correctly answered questions will make the ballot valid.

    The Schweitzer constitution with citizens initiative to vote in specific matters at anytime is also quite interesting. Maybe something to follow? but then powers that are will not like that. After all the current system is electing a dictator for 4 years. And parties only needs to delude voters for some weeks ahead of the election. After that they can give a shit.