In the June 1969 issue of Civil War History — Volume 5, Number 2, pages 116-132 — a renowned Southern historian attacked the legacy of Confederate Gen. Robert E. Lee.
"No single war figure stands in greater need of reevaluation than Lee," wrote Thomas L. Connelly, the late University of South Carolina professor. "One ponders whether the South may not have fared better had it possessed no Robert E. Lee."
Connelly's essay was among the first academic musket shots fired on Lee's standing as an outmatched but not outwitted military genius presiding over a Lost Cause — a reputation celebrated in fawning biographies and monuments like the one removed Friday in New Orleans.
Was General Lee overrated? Get your armchair historian on...
(Score: 2) by aristarchus on Tuesday June 13 2017, @11:09PM
Time will take care of statues. There used to be a rather impressive "Colossus" at Rhodes. Nero had a statue of himself erected beside the Coliseum, some hundreds of feet tall; it is not there anymore. Even the Emperor Constantine had a giant bronze statute of himself, of which only fragments remain.