Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Monday June 12 2017, @04:06AM   Printer-friendly
from the game-of-thrones dept.

Submitted via IRC for TheMightyBuzzard

Japan has passed legislation paving the way for 83-year-old Emperor Akihito to abdicate. The law sets the stage for the first abdication of a reigning monarch in two centuries, in a royal family which has a history stretching back 2,600 years.

[...] According to the 1947 Imperial House Law that regulates the line of imperial succession, the emperor cannot step down. The last Japanese monarch to abdicate was Emperor Kokaku, who left in favor of his son back in 1817.

Another issue the Japanese government will discuss is the continuity of the heirs, as women are not allowed to inherit the throne. Additionally, a woman from the imperial family who marries outside the family is then excluded. Akihito has another son, Prince Akishino, and a grandson, Hisahito, aged just 10. All the other members of the royal family are female.

Source: RT


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by dry on Tuesday June 13 2017, @05:42AM (2 children)

    by dry (223) on Tuesday June 13 2017, @05:42AM (#524802) Journal

    Charles can't abdicate his claim, the best he can do is abdicate after being declared King. Might only be a King for an instant, but he still has to be King to abdicate. Of course the Parliaments of the Commonwealth could change the succession law again but it doesn't seem likely.
    The Statute of Westminster, over the objections of the King, makes all the members of the Commonwealth equal, including in deciding changes to the succession. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Statute_of_Westminster_1931 [wikipedia.org]

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Wednesday June 14 2017, @12:44AM (1 child)

    by bob_super (1357) on Wednesday June 14 2017, @12:44AM (#525182)

    And he's got precedent, having married a divorcee.

    • (Score: 2) by dry on Wednesday June 14 2017, @04:54AM

      by dry (223) on Wednesday June 14 2017, @04:54AM (#525268) Journal

      It's a good excuse if Parliament decided to push him out like they did with Edward. Parliament is Supreme, something Americans forget with all their talk about George the Third being a Tyrant, whereas the Supremacy of Parliament was settled back in 1688 or so when they fired James the Second along with his son.