Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Monday June 19 2017, @08:23AM   Printer-friendly
from the disappointing dept.

OpenIndiana is a free and open source Unix operating system derived from OpenSolaris and based on illumos.

Curmudgeonly software reviewer Dedoimedo AKA Igor Ljubuncic reports:

Conclusion

I find the test today somewhat sad. Sure, I did accomplish what I needed, but it gave me no joy, and no hope that this operating system can even even remotely compare against any Linux. Even CentOS is lightyears ahead. In the server environment, it may have its uses, but it completely misses the mark on the desktop.

Package management, applications, it all just feels raw, alien, unfriendly. What do you do if there are problems with drivers, or hardware? Where do you find the latest apps, and this isn't just an act of mercy by a volunteer? What about compatibility on actual hardware. The fact I was not willing to commit my test laptop also tells something.

You can master and tame OpenIndiana, to a level. But it is mostly a futile exercise in obstinacy. All of the stuff we've done above are more or less a given in Linux, and have been so since about 2007. It's like driving an old car and trying to match its abilities to new, modern technology. Unless you're into antiques, it's not really worth it.

The worst part, I guess, isn't the specifics. That can be sorted. It's the absolute lack of progress since 2011, in the desktop space. Underneath it may be wonders, but if you cannot use the system, then it's worthless. Lots of the stuff from the previous version have been removed [or] made less accessible, but we get nothing new in return. So it is nerdier and harder than before, and that's a grim sign of a future that has no place on the desktop. This seems to be true with other operating systems in this family, too. Just not worth the effort. Stick with Linux. Grade wise, 4/10.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by TheRaven on Monday June 19 2017, @10:01AM (1 child)

    by TheRaven (270) on Monday June 19 2017, @10:01AM (#527830) Journal

    Lovely. Not only is this guy clueless about OpenSolaris, he's clueless about ZFS on Linux [zfsonlinux.org] and snapshot support in same, including Ubuntu [ubuntu.com] (crap that Ubuntu is).

    OpenSolaris had some patches to GNOME that integrated ZFS snapshots into the file browser to give a clean TimeMachine-inspired GUI. Were those patches upstreamed and made to work on other ZFS systems? (Honestly curious - I've never tried using this stuff on FreeBSD, but it would be nice if it worked there).

    --
    sudo mod me up
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by NotSanguine on Monday June 19 2017, @10:07AM

    OpenSolaris had some patches to GNOME that integrated ZFS snapshots into the file browser to give a clean TimeMachine-inspired GUI. Were those patches upstreamed and made to work on other ZFS systems? (Honestly curious - I've never tried using this stuff on FreeBSD, but it would be nice if it worked there).

    Honestly, I don't know. However, the "reviewer" seems unaware that ZFS (and by extension, snapshots) is available on most flavors of Linux. This guy seemed to think that just because there wasn't a GUI, the functionality didn't exist. Sigh.

    --
    No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr