Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Monday June 19 2017, @11:13PM   Printer-friendly
from the think-of-the-children dept.

We see smartphones everywhere. In school hallways, at the family dinner table and plugged in at the bedside table.

But how young is too young to be constantly connected to the rest of the world through sleek apps, social media and video messaging?

One Colorado man has decided that age 13 seems like a good cutoff.

Tim Farnum is leading the charge on a proposed ballot initiative in Colorado that would be the first of its kind in the country. Farnum's proposal would ban the sale of smartphones to children younger than 13, or more likely, to parents who intend to give the smartphone to kids in that age bracket.

Farnum, a Denver-area anesthesiologist, is the founder of Parents Against Underage Smartphones, or PAUS, the nonprofit group pushing the proposal.

Source: Coloradoan.com

Also reported by: The Washington Post

Initial Fiscal Impact Statement: Colorado.gov [PDF]


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Runaway1956 on Tuesday June 20 2017, @12:44AM (9 children)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday June 20 2017, @12:44AM (#528254) Journal

    "Surely there must be some age below which we could all agree a child should not have a phone."

    Sorry, but, no. People are complex. Kids are complex. There are kids almost 30 years old who aren't smart enough to decide what to have for dinner. There are other kids almost 10 years old who are pretty damned mature and quite responsible. I have some of both kind in my own family. What about your family?

    How about, instead of banning kids with phones, we hold the parent responsible for enforcing good decision making. Someone earlier mentioned that this dad is probably wimping out. He wants to deny his kid a phone, but he's afraid of just saying "NO!" He wants a law to hide behind. "Oh, I'm sorry, Katy, but the law says you can't have your own phone until your an old, withered hag."

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 20 2017, @12:53AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 20 2017, @12:53AM (#528261)

    There are kids almost 30 years old who aren't smart enough to decide what to have for dinner.

    Easy, whatever mom brings down to the basement is what's for dinner.

    • (Score: 3, Funny) by tibman on Tuesday June 20 2017, @01:08AM

      by tibman (134) Subscriber Badge on Tuesday June 20 2017, @01:08AM (#528270)

      Still in the larval stage, i see. In pupa she stops bringing it to you and just places it on the first step. You'll want to begin your mushroom and bacteria mat growths in this phase. You should have accumulated plenty of dishes by this point. Hopefully you left some extra biomass in them to start your cultures.

      --
      SN won't survive on lurkers alone. Write comments.
  • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Tuesday June 20 2017, @01:11AM (4 children)

    by kaszz (4211) on Tuesday June 20 2017, @01:11AM (#528272) Journal

    One possible way to solve it is to have the phone require simple mathematical riddles solved. Like "What is the derive of cos(5x+2) ?" ..answer in 30 seconds. Or the phone will lock for a week. If the user is too young they will not be able to answer it. The OS could implement this. And if the user is smart enough to hack it then they passed the "brains" test anyway.

    • (Score: 2) by krishnoid on Tuesday June 20 2017, @01:38AM (1 child)

      by krishnoid (1156) on Tuesday June 20 2017, @01:38AM (#528281)

      And if the user is smart enough to hack it then they passed the "brains" test anyway.

      How incredibly irresponsible. Are you suggesting that children wouldn't be sufficiently motivated enough to learn how to solve these problems? Or perhaps to write short, grammatically correct answers to demonstrate comprehension of increasingly complex reading material? What sort of a future are your recommendations guiding these poor children, and possibly even young adults, towards?

      • (Score: 3, Touché) by kaszz on Tuesday June 20 2017, @02:41AM

        by kaszz (4211) on Tuesday June 20 2017, @02:41AM (#528298) Journal

        A future where people that should not handle powerful things are prevented from doing so?

    • (Score: 2) by krishnoid on Tuesday June 20 2017, @04:13AM (1 child)

      by krishnoid (1156) on Tuesday June 20 2017, @04:13AM (#528331)

      Huh, looks like this already exists [studylockapp.com]. Neat!

      • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Wednesday June 21 2017, @05:19PM

        by kaszz (4211) on Wednesday June 21 2017, @05:19PM (#529123) Journal

        Now that is interesting. However they probably need a education in HTML and user interface design themselves first ;)
        (hint.. background makes the text undecipherable)

  • (Score: 3, Touché) by krishnoid on Tuesday June 20 2017, @04:48AM

    by krishnoid (1156) on Tuesday June 20 2017, @04:48AM (#528337)

    "Mommy, how old are you? You have your own phone and daddy said I had to wait until-- Er, Katy, why don't you come back here and we'll see what we can work out for you ..."

  • (Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Tuesday June 20 2017, @06:50PM

    by DeathMonkey (1380) on Tuesday June 20 2017, @06:50PM (#528646) Journal

    True that! I know of one 71 year old guy that should probably have his phone taken away too!