Slash Boxes

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday June 30 2017, @05:32AM   Printer-friendly
from the Slightly-Smaller-Brother dept.

A small Victory in Hamilton, Ontario where the City has backed off on plans to start recording all of the various security and traffic cameras in the city; handing the video over to Microsoft for analysis. Local city hall watching site The Public Record pointed out that this plan would likely run afoul of Ontario's privacy legislation, and convinced the City not to go ahead with the plan.

The City announced in early June that it would begin transferring video to Microsoft for analysis.

Microsoft is working to build software which recognizes cars, bus, trucks, bicycles, and pedestrians. Using the video, and crowd sourced analysis, Microsoft hoped to improve its software for detecting near collisions.

The City hoped to use the software to gain insight into intersections which could use design improvements to decrease the number and severity of collisions as part of its "Vision Zero" efforts.

Immediately upon learning the City would be recording video from the intersection cameras, The Public Record looked into the privacy implications of the recording.

The Privacy Commissioner replied "We encourage institutions to consult our publication, Guidelines for the Use of Video Surveillance (pdf), and our Video Surveillance (pdf)fact sheet, which outline important issues to consider when implementing video surveillance technologies and how to use them in ways that protect individual privacy. Since the City's project also seems to include 'analytics' of video data, you may also be interested in our publication, Big Data Guidelines (pdf), which addresses the issue of data analytics and privacy."

So, it appears that you can fight City Hall!

Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by urza9814 on Friday June 30 2017, @05:14PM

    by urza9814 (3954) on Friday June 30 2017, @05:14PM (#533564) Journal

    I may be missing your point, but reCAPTCHA isn't Microsoft; it's Google. if you want to be a spammer, you can take that reCaptcha image from Google that asks to identify street signs, then hand that to the Microsoft algorithm which will identify the street signs and solve the captcha.

    Of course, when I first learned of reCaptcha back when they were only doing text, the idea was that they were giving you words that the OCR had trouble figuring out. They'd give two words back then though, one that the computer already knew, and one that it didn't. That way it could aggregate the results for words it didn't know to figure out what they were. Not sure that they're still doing this with the street signs, since they often only show one single image. But the original intention was specifically to use the cases that the OCR system couldn't already figure out, so they might be able to do something similar where they feed the street signs to Microsoft's algorithm (or their own -- I'm sure they have one too) and use the ones it doesn't understand as their captchas.

    Eventually the AI will get better until it *can* beat all the captchas (or do as well as a human) at which point they'll need to find something else. But that's not really a problem, it's the intended result.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3