Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Thursday July 06 2017, @06:43PM   Printer-friendly
from the retroactive-decisions dept.

The Canadian Broadcasting Corporation reports:

A Halifax [Nova Scotia] man is facing the daunting task of going through almost two decades of email messages after his email provider served notice it was deactivating his account in 30 days because of his email address: noreply@eastlink.ca

"I had it since the late '90s, probably 1998 when I really started getting online," Steve Morshead told CBC News.

"I asked for it, it was available and they gave it to me without hesitation."

He said he picked the handle "noreply" because he wanted an unusual address--and back in the '90s, it was.

Morshead never expected to lose his email address, which he uses for communicating with everyone from friends to banks to lawyers. He is in the process of selling his home and says this couldn't come at a worse time.

[...] "Now, after all these years, 20 years almost, I find it reprehensible they want to pop out of bushes and just give me 30 days to go through 20 years worth of emails and decide what I want to keep," he said.

[...] Morshead did ask the company to transfer the contents from the existing email account to a new one but they said no.

"Just flat no. No offers of help. Just the bullying that 'We're going to do it, you're going to take it. That's it.'"

Also at The Inquirer.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 07 2017, @08:15AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 07 2017, @08:15AM (#536039)

    It does over here.

    Our law says that you are not allowed to own a domain for the purpose of selling it. So if someone wants your domain, they will just claim that you do. Then a judge with no IT knowledge will take a look at your home page (e-mail, SSH and all that stuff he doesn't understand doesn't count), and conclude that since there is no financial purpose of your private web site, that you have no use for the domain other than possibly selling it. And so he orders that it be transferred to the company that wants your domain.

    I have personally decided to not get a .dk domain for that reason.

  • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Friday July 07 2017, @01:57PM

    by kaszz (4211) on Friday July 07 2017, @01:57PM (#536112) Journal

    Danish courts are that retarded? Maybe it can be countered with a website documenting some hobby project of yours to make it look occupied?

    (not that I hold other courts higher, they seem to be populated with the same retards worldwide)