Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Journal by cafebabe

What is the minimum frequency response which should be represented by an audio codec? Well, what is the best analog or digital system and is it worthwhile to approach, match or exceed its specification?

Analog record players have an exceptionally good minimum frequency response. Technically, the minimum frequency response is determined by the duration of the recording. So, a 45 minute long-play record has a fundamental frequency of 1/2700Hz - which is about 0.0004Hz. Does this make any practical difference? Most definitely yes. People lampoon analog purists or stated that LP and CD are directly equivalent. Some of the lampooning is justisfied but the core argument is true. Most implementations of Compact Disc Audio don't achieve useful functionality.

Many Compact Disc players boldly state "1-Bit DAC Oversampling" or suchlike. The 1-Bit DAC is simplistically brilliant and variants are used in many contexts. However, oversampling is the best of a bad bodge. The optics of a Compact Disc are variable and, even with FEC in the form of Reed-Solomon encoding, about 1% of audio sectors don't get read. What happens in this case? Very early CD players would just output nothing. This technique was superceded with duplicate output. (Early Japanese CD players had an impressive amount of analog circuitry and no other facility to stretch audio.)

Eventually, manufacturers advanced to oversampling techniques. In the event that data cannot be obtained optically from disc, gaps are smoothed with a re-construction from available data. Unfortunately, there is a problem with this technique. Nothing below 43Hz can be re-constructed. 2KB audio sectors have 1024×16 bit samples and samples are played at exactly 44.1kHz. So, audio sectors are played at the rate of approximately 43Hz. However, any technique which continues audio waves has a fundamental frequency of 43Hz. Given that drop-outs occur with some correlation at a rate of 1%, this disrupts any reproduction of frequencies below 43Hz. For speech, this would be superior to GSM's baseline AMR which has 50Hz audio blocks. For music, this is a deal-breaker.

Remove the intermittant reading problems and the fundamental frequency is the length of the recording. So, a 16 bit linear PCM .WAV of 74 minutes has a fundamental frequency of approximately, 0.0002Hz. The same data burned as audio sectors on a Compact Disc only has a fundamental frequency of 43Hz. (I'll ignore the reverse of this process due to cooked sectors.)

So, it is trivial to retain low frequencies within a digital system. Just ensure that all data is present and correct. Furthermore, low frequencies require minimal storage and can be prioritized when streaming.

A related question is the minimum frequency response for a video codec. That's an equally revealing question.

 

Reply to: Re:Sage Advice

    (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 10 2017, @01:28AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 10 2017, @01:28AM (#536994)

    Primarily, headphone speaker cones are small and therefore are terrible for reproducing sounds with long wavelengths.

    As opposed to a ~50ft 20Hz wavelength in air? Headphones (with multiple drivers) have advantages in terms of frequency response and directionality.

    I currently favor a baseline specification of up to 32 two inch speakers. This will have obvious limitations but consumers already accept vastly inferior systems.

    Yes obvious limitations considering they cannot possibly reproduce lower frequencies at the required SPL... while headphones can, *facepalm*

    So it's that AC again, I'm checking back for replies. Not to beat on you, I'm actually (somewhat) interested in your project. You should check my claims and you should pay attention to working engineers and not "golden-ear" types or audiofools. Please keep posting ;)

Post Comment

Edit Comment You are not logged in. You can log in now using the convenient form below, or Create an Account, or post as Anonymous Coward.

Public Terminal

Anonymous Coward [ Create an Account ]

Use the Preview Button! Check those URLs!


Logged-in users aren't forced to preview their comments. Create an Account!

Allowed HTML
<b|i|p|br|a|ol|ul|li|dl|dt|dd|em|strong|tt|blockquote|div|ecode|quote|sup|sub|abbr|sarc|sarcasm|user|spoiler|del>

URLs
<URL:http://example.com/> will auto-link a URL

Important Stuff

  • Please try to keep posts on topic.
  • Try to reply to other people's comments instead of starting new threads.
  • Read other people's messages before posting your own to avoid simply duplicating what has already been said.
  • Use a clear subject that describes what your message is about.
  • Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated. (You can read everything, even moderated posts, by adjusting your threshold on the User Preferences Page)
  • If you want replies to your comments sent to you, consider logging in or creating an account.

If you are having a problem with accounts or comment posting, please yell for help.