Slash Boxes

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Monday July 10 2017, @07:27AM   Printer-friendly
from the hot-turkey dept.

The Associated Press newswire reports:

After three defendants fatally overdosed in a single week last year, it became clear that Buffalo's ordinary drug treatment court was no match for the heroin and painkiller crisis.

Now the city is experimenting with the nation's first opioid crisis intervention court, which can get users into treatment within hours of their arrest instead of days, requires them to check in with a judge every day for a month instead of once a week, and puts them on strict curfews. Administering justice takes a back seat to the overarching goal of simply keeping defendants alive.

[...] Buffalo-area health officials blamed 300 deaths on opioid overdoses in 2016, up from 127 two years earlier. That includes a young couple who did not make it to their second drug court appearance last spring. The woman's father arrived instead to tell the judge his daughter and her boyfriend had died the night before.

[...] "This 30-day thing is like being beat up and being asked to get in the ring again, and you're required to," 36-year-old Ron Woods said after one of his daily face-to-face meetings with City Court Judge Craig Hannah, who presides over the program.

Woods said his heroin use started with an addiction to painkillers prescribed after cancer treatments that began when he was 21. He was arrested on drug charges in mid-May and agreed to intervention with the dual hope of kicking the opioids that have killed two dozen friends and seeing the felony charges against him reduced or dismissed.

[...] "I don't want to die in the streets, especially with the fentanyl out there," Sammy Delgado, one of the handcuffed defendants, said.

Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by Grishnakh on Monday July 10 2017, @03:19PM (1 child)

    by Grishnakh (2831) on Monday July 10 2017, @03:19PM (#537138)

    Yeah, but it's not as overbearing as the previous system which punishes people harshly and offers no real treatment.

    The big difference I see is the ethnicity of the offenders: when the drugs are largely used by urban blacks, the "justice" system is happy to throw them in the slammer and ruin their lives, and they've been doing this for decades (in fact, MJ was banned specifically because it was popular with black people). But now when it's poor and working-class white people (including a lot of Trump voters) that are overwhelmingly the ones affected by this class of drugs (opioids), suddenly now they want to try a kinder, gentler approach that doesn't completely destroy their lives.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 10 2017, @04:36PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 10 2017, @04:36PM (#537163)

    That explains 1/2 the story. The other 1/2 is taking away all their healthcare options. Does it make sense on any level?