Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Saturday July 15 2017, @10:41PM   Printer-friendly
from the status-quo dept.

Arthur T Knackerbracket has found the following story:

Human beings largely object to income inequality and are willing to correct injustice—unless, of course, it rattles their status quo.

That's the conclusion of a recent study looking at how far people would go to redistribute resources between the haves and have nots. Participants fiercely objected to "when winners become losers and losers become winners," researchers note in the paper, published in the latest issue of Nature Human Behaviour.

Researchers initially recruited Indian, American, and Chinese participants take part in an experimental game they called "the redistribution game." The gist of the game was simple: Participants were given a number of scenarios that would redistribute a fixed sum from a richer person to someone poorer. Participants were told the original standing of wealth was assigned randomly.

In the first scenario, participants had to decide if they wanted to transfer two coins from person A (who already had four coins) to person B (who had one). Researchers note the "transfer would reduce inequality," (as there's less of a gap between them), but person B would end up one coin richer than person A, reversing their status.

In the second version of game, participants were asked whether they'd transfer one coin to person B (where person A ended up with three coins and person B with two coins). Researchers ran a third and fourth scenario that allowed participants to transfer coins from person A to B, where the outcome still left person A with significantly more coins.

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 16 2017, @12:33AM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 16 2017, @12:33AM (#539709)

    Pressure gradients drive gas flow. Thermal gradients cause heat flow. Concentration gradients lead to ion motion. Income gradients induce human activity. Without income inequality, humanity would be even less productive by many measures than it is now.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=1, Underrated=1, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 16 2017, @02:18AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 16 2017, @02:18AM (#539745)

    Enough of a current through a potential gradient will kill you.

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by mth on Sunday July 16 2017, @02:29AM

      by mth (2848) on Sunday July 16 2017, @02:29AM (#539753) Homepage

      Yep. I think the discussion shouldn't be about whether inequality should exist, but what levels of inequality are acceptable.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 16 2017, @06:20AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 16 2017, @06:20AM (#539818)
    Income gradients, if much too extreme though, will do something analogous to attempting to increase the potential gradient (voltage) between two terminals separated by an insulator beyond the maximum it can stand. The technical term is 'breakdown voltage', because it usually results in the insulator breaking down. Societies tend to behave like insulators when it comes to income gradients, and just as with electrical insulators there is a maximum income gradient that a society can endure before it breaks down. Trying to go there usually results in unpleasant things like revolutions and civil wars.
  • (Score: 1) by YeaWhatevs on Sunday July 16 2017, @12:55PM

    by YeaWhatevs (5623) on Sunday July 16 2017, @12:55PM (#539880)

    I like your thinking. Keep in mind though, equally distributed capital tends to become concentrated, not the other way around. This means trying to make a buck is doing work on the system. If you want to see a real explosion of productivity, reset all debts to 0 and distribute capital equally. Then watch the system move towards its equilibrium distribution.