Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Sunday July 16 2017, @07:47AM   Printer-friendly
from the rockets-are-expensive dept.

Commercial space companies want NASA to expand the Commercial Orbital Transportation Services program. SpaceX's senior vice president for global business and government affairs called for the COTS program to be extended to deep space activities:

Commercial space companies today (July 13) urged legislators to extend NASA's successful public-private partnerships for International Space Station transportation to future programs, including human missions to Mars.

NASA already is working with six firms to develop prototype habitats that would augment the agency's multibillion-dollar Orion capsule and Space Launch System heavy-lift rocket. NASA has said it intends to use the system to send astronauts to Mars in the 2030s.

[...] Technologies that SpaceX would be interested in developing in partnership with NASA include heavy-cargo missions to Mars, deep-space communications systems, and demonstrations of vertical takeoff and landing on the moon, Hughes said.

Getting spacecraft like the Interplanetary Spaceship to Mars will probably require SpaceX to dip into the NASA coffers yet again:

This proposal was foreshadowed last year in Guadalajara, Mexico. At the International Astronautical Congress there, Musk presented a sketch of the architecture needed to lower the cost of transit to Mars enough to make colonization feasible. His top-line cost of $10 billion, however, is likely out of reach for SpaceX in the near term—without the help of a big-pocketed government. "There's a lot of people in the private sector who are interested in helping fund a base on Mars, and perhaps there will be interest on the government sector side to do that," Musk said last fall.

Also at Ars Technica and LA Times (broader article about the economics of heavy launch capabilities).


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Gaaark on Sunday July 16 2017, @04:23PM (1 child)

    by Gaaark (41) on Sunday July 16 2017, @04:23PM (#539927) Journal

    Yeah, who owns the patents on discoveries made while using public funds: the public? Free use to non-profit initiatives of the public/government?

    Don't tax us, SHIT! MAN!, but can we use some of the money we don't pay the government to take the risk?...oh, and any patents we file are owned by us, reeet? Reet??

    We don' wanna pay no taxes,but we want the taxes to pay for our risk, so we can earn mega profits we don' wanna pay any taxes on........

    "You can't have everything... where would you put it? -- Steven Wright"

    --
    --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 16 2017, @04:35PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 16 2017, @04:35PM (#539929)

    Man oh man, imagine how great SoylentNews could be if instead of paying any tax to any government, every Soylentik paid all that revenue into SoylentNews donations instead.