Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Sunday July 16 2017, @09:22AM   Printer-friendly
from the for-the-Linux-noobs dept.

Datamation examines the Debian and Ubuntu distros in detail by starting with the question, what is the difference between Debian and Ubuntu? Neither GNU/Linux distro has been out of Distrowatch's top six since 2005, and for the last four years neither has been out of the top three. There are good reasons for that. Though if systemd is not your cup of tea, there is also a Debian fork, Devuan, which is basically Debian GNU/Linux minus systemd.


[Ed Note: For many in the community who are Linux experts, this article may have no appeal. For those of us that are new to it and trying to learn, something this basic is a nice read and contains good information.]

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by bart9h on Sunday July 16 2017, @05:02PM (13 children)

    by bart9h (767) on Sunday July 16 2017, @05:02PM (#539939)

    Yes, today I despise Ubuntu as many of you do. But I used it for a few years around about a decade ago, and I recognize it's historical importance of bringing Linux to the common user. It was the first distro to "just work". In fact, it was easier to install and operate than Windows. That was some major achievement. Today, I'm a happy Devuan user.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Sunday July 16 2017, @05:20PM (5 children)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Sunday July 16 2017, @05:20PM (#539945) Journal

    I find your post to be a little humorous. No, Ubuntu wasn't the first to "just work". My first working installation of Linux was Suse Linux, on an early AMD Sledgehammer build. I had already tried to install Windows XP 64-bit, and failed. I tried installing a few Linux distros, and failed. I downloaded the then-current Suse, and magically, everything "just worked". I found out later that Suse had an early, inside track on some of the 64 bit data that was necessary to make everything work correctly. Every single driver I needed was packaged with the distro, and it wasn't necessary for me to do ANYTHING more than give it a name, password, and time to write to disk.

    • (Score: 3, Informative) by AthanasiusKircher on Sunday July 16 2017, @10:17PM (3 children)

      by AthanasiusKircher (5291) on Sunday July 16 2017, @10:17PM (#540055) Journal

      I knew the parent post here would engender a bunch of "no, X already was 'just works'..." comments, and lo and behold, here they are.

      It depends on one's definition of "just works" as well as one's personal experience and how many different types of systems one tried to install things on.

      I think for many people "just works" means something like a stereotypical Windows or Mac OS installation experience post year 2000 or so. (And before we hear the flood of nightmare stories about how hard it was to install Windows on some machine... yeah, that happened too. Hopefully all of us here know that, so most of us also know that Windows and Mac OS was deployed on millions of computers around the world with standardized installations that usually worked well with little fuss.)

      "Just works" for most former Windows etc. users = you install the OS without having to resort to command line hacks. If a driver is missing or something, a few clicks and download or two will generally fix it. Done.

      While Suse, Red Hat, and various other Linux distros over the years simplified the installation process and provided better support out of the box, it was undoubtedly part of Ubuntu's philosophy to be a "just works" distro for the VAST MAJORITY of standard PC hardware configurations, thereby allowing a more widespread adoption of Linux.

      Unfortunately, I don't think Ubuntu actually succeeded at that initially. I've been using Linux for ~20 years (and Unix derivatives for years before that), but around a decade ago I finally got a bit fed up and wanted a "just works" distro myself that didn't require me to spend a few hours after install or upgrades sorting things out.

      At that time (ca. 2007) Ubuntu still wasn't "just works" for someone like the common Windows user who didn't want to deal with CLI for basic stuff during installation. I first tried installing Ubuntu on a standard Dell business desktop (one of the most popular models of the time, with a standard Dell monitor), and was stuck in Xorg config hell to even get a GUI on booting up after install with Ubuntu. That or some other random thing broke on various installs of newer versions over the next few years, causing me to abandon Ubuntu and go back to Debian for a while.

      For me (and I do not claim my experience to be universal), the first "just works" Linux distro was probably Mint ca. 2011. At that time, I tried installing Mint not only on several of my own machines, but several belonging to my family, and recommended it to several friends who had not used Linux before. Every install went down without a hitch or need to resort to command line config files to fix something, or tweaking obscure settings just to get basic audio codecs going, etc.

      So yeah, I'm sure you (and many others) have had "just works" experiences before then. But Ubuntu really tried to make that experience even easier and more widespread. I think Mint finally accomplished it earlier, and Ubuntu and some others have since caught up in terms of hardware compatibility and ease of install.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 17 2017, @12:30AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Monday July 17 2017, @12:30AM (#540094)

        I don't think Ubuntu actually succeeded at ["just works"] initially

        They knew that their first release (Ubuntu 4.10, October 2004) still had lots of rough spots, so they called it Warty Warthog.

        The June 2006[1] release (6.06, Dapper Drake) was clean enough that there was a serious uptick in folks trying Linux.
        (It didn't hurt that they would mail you a CD, gratis, anywhere on the planet.)

        [1] They missed their release date, projected for April; that has since become standardized (x.04).
        Dapper was the point at which they started the alphabetical order thing with release names.

        .
        Yeah, when Mint hit its stride, that was a notable inflection point for average folks who wanted to try Linux.

        -- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]

      • (Score: 2) by el_oscuro on Monday July 17 2017, @01:08AM

        by el_oscuro (1711) on Monday July 17 2017, @01:08AM (#540104)

        In the 90s, I had played around with various early distros and found doing even trivial stuff extremely hard. So I always went back to Windows. But in 2002/2003 I got a new motherboard/case/HD, and wanted to have a real legal install of Windows on it. So I headed over to the O/S section and Windows 2000 Workstation was listed at $199, while Red Hat workstation 7 was $49 and came with a manual. So I decide to try Linux again. A few hours and 5 CDs later, I had a fully operational system with every application installed. Getting up on the internet was a simple as providing the dial up number in the GUI and with Mozzila's built-in popup blocker, life on the Internet was like 1996. There were definitely challenges such as games and installing software that wasn't on the extensive CD repository. But mostly, I could immediately do everything I needed to. Thus Linux became the O/S of my primary workstation.

        I never went back to Windows. I did eventually install SUSE a few years later. My kids were out playing in the leaves and I had just got a digital USB camera. I needed to transfer the pictures to a computer quickly so I could take some more. There are only so many times you will get good pictures of your kids playing in leaves. :) I didn't want to dick with on Linux so I plugged the USB in to a Windows machine I still had and....

        Nothing. No recognition of the device, no new drive letter, nothing. Finally, I figured out you had do download 100mb of crapware from Kodak to get drivers to recognize the camera. It took an hour. I was trying to avoid shit like this by using the "it just works" for Windows. And USB is supposed to
        be plug in play.

        After all of that, I tried plugging in the camera to my SUSE machine. Once I plugged it in, a dialog box popped up:
        "A USB camera has been detected. Would you like to import photos into F-spot?" And the shit just worked. At that point, Windows was done. I later replaced that SUSE machine with a sweet Dell Ubuntu and never looked back. Now you can find pretty much anything you need in the repositories, Wine runs lots of Windows only stuff (sometimes better than current version of Windows) and Steam/GOG provides more Linux games than I can possibly play.

           

        --
        SoylentNews is Bacon! [nueskes.com]
      • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Monday July 17 2017, @04:30AM

        by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Monday July 17 2017, @04:30AM (#540175) Journal

        Ya know, I think you pretty well nailed it. Along with Reziac's "it's that no two user experiences are alike!!" sums everything up very nicely.

    • (Score: 2) by Reziac on Monday July 17 2017, @02:38AM

      by Reziac (2489) on Monday July 17 2017, @02:38AM (#540132) Homepage

      Huh. Back in the 32bit era (before live ISOs), SuSE would *never* install for me. In the 64bit world, it's still the most likely to fail to load from a live ISO.

      Well, if there's one thing you can always say about linux, it's that no two user experiences are alike!!

      --
      And there is no Alkibiades to come back and save us from ourselves.
  • (Score: 2, Disagree) by VLM on Sunday July 16 2017, @05:49PM

    by VLM (445) Subscriber Badge on Sunday July 16 2017, @05:49PM (#539950)

    It was the first distro to "just work"

    That was SLS "softlanding linux solutions" circa 1993, 1994 ish timeframe. Distributed as a set of floppy disks which were split tar files. Like set A booted and didn't do much else, set B came with usable base commands to do stuff, set C came with the compiler, set K was the kernel source (0.99 or something?) and set X was very old but working Xwindow. Possibly set E was emacs. Everything worked assuming your floppy disks held up. I seem to remember it took two boxes of floppy disks if you wanted an entire set, but if you were industrious yet cheap, the largest set was only 7 or so disks, so you'd install A B and C and then optionally reuse the disks for K or X if you wanted that kind of thing.

  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by pTamok on Sunday July 16 2017, @06:48PM (3 children)

    by pTamok (3042) on Sunday July 16 2017, @06:48PM (#539967)

    I would like to be a happy Devuan user, but it doesn't quite meet my wishes, which is a shame. That said, neither does Debian. In both cases, the standard installers don't have the capability of building the environment I want. I might be forced into doing some heavy hacking.

    However, what I will say is that I support the Devuan philosophy of choice of init system - that is "Init Freedom"

    Init Freedom is about restoring a sane approach to PID1, one that respects diversity and freedom of choice.

    ( from https://www.devuan.org/os/init-freedom/ [devuan.org] )

    While I'm trying to make the move from Kubuntu, I'm also trying to work out what is easiest to use as a supportable system for my relatives, and am currently leaning towards Lubuntu, for practical reasons. While I'm not thrilled at having to uses proprietary blobs to support their hardware and Pulseaudio (because of Firefox), the advantages of having a relatively sane mainstream system are clear. Skype was a deal-breaker: if Skype for Linux did not exist, none would move off Windows. I managed to move them from Windows Live Mail to Thunderbird, and from IE/Edge to Firefox, but Skype...

    I've been reading an interesting blog of someone trying to use a Fedora Linux system for work, instead of iOS. In a business context, the calendar issues he has are indeed a problem. ( http://blog.scottlowe.org//2017/07/10/linux-migration-july-2017-progress-report/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+slowe%2Fcontent%2Ffeed+%28blog.scottlowe.org+Content+Feed%29 [scottlowe.org] ) I think it illustrates that Linux is not ready to take over the generic corporate desktop. Yet. Which is a shame, but unsurprising.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 16 2017, @09:50PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 16 2017, @09:50PM (#540043)

      > However, what I will say is that I support the Devuan philosophy of choice of init system - that is "Init Freedom"

      Well, except that Devuan does not offer "init freedom" at all: you get to choose between sysvinit and sysvinit.
      In Debian proper at least two different choices are supported.

    • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 16 2017, @11:57PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Sunday July 16 2017, @11:57PM (#540082)

      60 percent of that URL is noise.
      Next time, chop it off before the question mark and see if it still works.
      (It almost always will.)

      Better still: Also use proper link text.

      -- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]

      • (Score: 1) by pTamok on Friday July 28 2017, @09:06PM

        by pTamok (3042) on Friday July 28 2017, @09:06PM (#545977)

        Sorry.

        I usually do prune URLs in the way you mention*: I simply forgot this time. Mea culpa.

        *Usually to remove all the tracking guff.

  • (Score: 2) by tibman on Sunday July 16 2017, @08:16PM (1 child)

    by tibman (134) Subscriber Badge on Sunday July 16 2017, @08:16PM (#540001)

    Mandrake was probably the first distro to "just work".

    --
    SN won't survive on lurkers alone. Write comments.
    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Reziac on Monday July 17 2017, @02:44AM

      by Reziac (2489) on Monday July 17 2017, @02:44AM (#540135) Homepage

      Back when we were still installing from CDs, that was indeed my experience -- Mandrake 7.x was the first one I tried where most stuff Just Worked, or at least it did better at it than any other distro I'd tried (of dozens, starting in 1998).

      Funny thing, when I've had distro-testing spasms since then... the ones that work best out of the box (and suit me best) always seem to be Mandrake descendants.

      --
      And there is no Alkibiades to come back and save us from ourselves.