Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday July 27 2017, @06:49PM   Printer-friendly
from the There's-nothing-hotter-than-ITS-90 dept.

At face value, measuring the temperature using Celsius instead of Fahrenheit seems to make sense. After all, the freezing point of water in Celsius is a perfect 0 degrees C — not that inexplicable 32 degrees, as in Fahrenheit. Also, the boiling point of water in Celsius is right at 100 degrees (Okay, 99.98, but what's a couple hundredths of a degree among friends?), instead of the awkward 212 degrees Fahrenheit.

But Fahrenheit may be the best way to measure temperature after all. Why? Because most of us only care about air temperature, not water temperature.

Celsius is great for measuring the temperature of water. However, we're human beings who live on dry ground. As a result, it's best to use a temperature gauge that's suited to the air, as opposed to one that's best used for water. This is one reason why Fahrenheit is superior.

Fahrenheit is also more precise. The ambient temperature on most of the inhabited world ranges from -20 degrees Fahrenheit to 110 degrees Fahrenheit — a 130-degree range. On the Celsius scale, that range is from -28.8 degrees to 43.3 degrees — a 72.1-degree range. This means that you can get a more exact measurement of the air temperature using Fahrenheit because it uses almost twice the scale.

A precise reading of temperature is important to us because just a little variation can result in a perceivable level of discomfort. Most of us are people who are easily affected even by even slight changes in the thermometer, and the Fahrenheit scale is more sensitive to those changes.

It seems the author is saying that nobody uses fractions of degrees in day-to-day life, so Fahrenheit is a better scale because it has smaller increments. I'm not sold on this, because you'll get the same temperature variation within a room whether you set your air-conditioning system to 21°C or 70°F, and people will complain that they prefer the room to be a bit warmer/cooler/whatever.

Does anyone here have another reason for advocating the continued use of the Fahrenheit scale ?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by kazzie on Friday July 28 2017, @01:55PM

    by kazzie (5309) Subscriber Badge on Friday July 28 2017, @01:55PM (#545759)

    I'm told in UK land they don't have baking thermostatic controlled ovens like in the USA, so we set a thermostat to 325 to heat up a chicken taco casserole or WTF and believe it or not my stove is within 10 degrees usually. But in the UK they use "gas jet numbers" or some whackiness so my casserole would be gently warmed to just under browning temps using a gas jet #7a or WTF.

    Gas mark numbers are only used on gas ovens. Electrically operated ovens here are marked in Celsius (or sometimes Celsius and Fahrenheit).

    My impression is that gas ovens are going the way of the dodo. The only gas oven I've ever seen was in an off-grid holiday house on Bardsey Island [wikipedia.org], where there was also a gas-powered fridge and gas-powered table lamps.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2