Slash Boxes

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Friday July 28 2017, @03:21AM   Printer-friendly
from the children-of-soy dept.

The BBC reports that sperm quality continues to drop. Specifically, researchers "found a 52.4% decline in sperm concentration, and a 59.3% decline in total sperm count in men from North America, Europe, Australia and New Zealand." While alarmist publications tout this as a 60% drop, the decline is accelerating and the researchers are concerned that inaction may lead to species extinction despite the effect not being observed in regions with high machismo, such as South America, Asia and Africa.

The study "aggregates 185 studies between 1973 and 2011, one of the largest ever undertaken." It supposedly overcomes selection bias occurring from patients attending fertility (virility?) clinics and selection bias of null results not being published in journals (churnals?). My intuition is that insights can be gained from studying transsexualism. Practitioners claim patients increase at the rate of 15% per year (doubling every five years), over many decades and with no end in sight. This is akin to Moore's law, Kryder's law, Butters' law, Hendy's law, Rider's law, Carlson's law or any other exponential halving or doubling. So, it doesn't take a genius to understand that it will become an increasingly widespread issue.

Regardless, masculine medical problems are vastly under-represented. By some estimates, spending on male medical problems is about 1/4 of spending on female medical problems. For example, when a man seeks help for a legitimate medical issue, such as declining testosterone, a patient at the lower end of the "normal" range may be denied treatment even if he is constantly exhausted.

Well, take care of yourself. Eat properly. Drink properly. Rest properly. Stay active. And if healthy food and exercise won't fix accumulated problems, consider hormone replacement. You may also want to watch two films which seem to be mentioned with increasing frequency and seem to predict our era with some accuracy: Children Of Men and Colossus: The Forbin Project. Children Of Men is the second bleakest film I've ever seen and the film I've seen most during its initial cinema release. It explores the scenario of global infertility leading to economic collapse. In addition to a nexus of cast and crew, the seamless plot and astounding compositing, the film is a fantastic example of mise-en-scène which is best explained by example.

Anyhow, enjoy the films and get your medical problems addressed.

Disclosure: People in my family are affected by virility and hormone problems. I have a professional interest in film, media encoding and art education.

Original Submission

This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 28 2017, @08:52AM (9 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 28 2017, @08:52AM (#545669)

    Another bullshit article... serious bullshit.

    We have well over 7 BILLION individuals on the planet. The population is going to get past 10 BILLION soon. How are we going to be extinct if not via our own devices? Certainly, fertility is NOT one of the problems we, as a society, are having. This is beyond alarmist. They might as well start talking about black holes eating up the planet.

    There are species that we are driving to extinction because of number of humans on this planet. When their numbers are over 1000, then they are OK. Under 100, then there is genetic issues. But we are 7,000,000,000. There is 7,000,000 for every single animal in a population of 1000 that is close to extinction. This means if everyone wanted to see an example of such a 1000 individual species, and they had 1 minute to look at it, it would take 5000 years. Most of the people would not have a chance to even see such an animal because of OUR numbers.

    So WTF? Whoever wrote this opinion needs a kick in the nuts.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 3, Funny) by lx on Friday July 28 2017, @01:40PM (4 children)

    by lx (1915) on Friday July 28 2017, @01:40PM (#545753)

    You don't understand. This is nothing less than an attack on our precious bodily fluids.

    • (Score: 2) by looorg on Friday July 28 2017, @02:03PM (1 child)

      by looorg (578) on Friday July 28 2017, @02:03PM (#545763)

      We should retreat to the mineshafts . A few hundred thousand of us should be enough, lets say at a 10:1 female to male ratio so we can repopulate and once again make the western world great?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 28 2017, @02:40PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 28 2017, @02:40PM (#545772)

      "Women uh... women sense my power and they seek the life essence. I, uh... I do not avoid women, Mandrake. ...but I do deny them my essence."

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 28 2017, @04:45PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday July 28 2017, @04:45PM (#545855)

      Are you by chance a boy who is not able satisfactorily to explain what a Hrung is, nor why it should choose to collapse on Betelgeuse Seven?

  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Sulla on Friday July 28 2017, @02:24PM

    by Sulla (5173) on Friday July 28 2017, @02:24PM (#545767) Journal

    If you are concerned about animals in this planet going extinct you should be worried about the decline of western culture. We fail at a lot of things and are slow to react to emergencies but we do eventually react. We have a self sustaining african elephant santuary here in the US where they can roam semi-free and continue to grow, our citizens donate more than most countries to helping africa/elsewhere (I presume a bunch goes into conservation), and we work through zoos/whatevers to attempt to bring species back from the brink.

    Yeah we fail, but we also aren't eating whale, giant chinese salimander, killing off a whole dolphin species because we are so dirty, etc.

    Ceterum censeo Sinae esse delendam
  • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Friday July 28 2017, @11:01PM (2 children)

    by JoeMerchant (3937) on Friday July 28 2017, @11:01PM (#546024)

    So, say 4,999 / 5,000 men are sperm-count-deficient, but one, somewhere, somehow, retains his virility. To achieve replacement birth rates, women need to have 2.1 babies in their lifetime - so this one guy could "service" about 1500 women per decade, keeping them at or above replacement birth rates via whatever insemination methods are deemed socially acceptable. If he stays fertile for ~35 years and everybody signs on for the surrogate father thing, there's no decline in population whatsoever.

    Stranger things have happened, though I think the article is puffing up the story just to sell some scare copies.

    🌻 []
    • (Score: 1) by toddestan on Saturday July 29 2017, @10:36PM (1 child)

      by toddestan (4982) on Saturday July 29 2017, @10:36PM (#546452)

      The big problem with that scenario would be the generations after that. If most of the humans in the world have the same fathers (or grandfathers, etc.) then genetic diversity would take a pretty big hit, and soon everyone would essentially be inbred. So we'd have another problem on our hands which might threaten our extinction after a few more generations.

      • (Score: 2) by JoeMerchant on Sunday July 30 2017, @03:05AM

        by JoeMerchant (3937) on Sunday July 30 2017, @03:05AM (#546527)

        Worked O.K. for Genghis Khan - not saying that inbreeding is good, or should go on indefinitely, but sooner or later we'll be editing our children's genes before they're conceived, right?

        🌻 []