Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Thursday May 29 2014, @05:16PM   Printer-friendly
from the it's-more-fun-when-you-write-the-rules dept.

Popular culture website Wikia originally hosted its user-contributed content under a free, sharealike Commercial Commons license (CC-BY-SA). At least as soon as 2003, some specific wikis decided to use the non-commercial CC-BY-NC license instead: hey, this license supposedly protects the authors, and anyone is free to choose how they want to license their work anyway, right?

However, in late 2012 Wikia added to its License terms of service a retroactive clause for all its non-commercial content, granting Wikia an exclusive right to use this content in commercial contexts, effectively making all CC-BY-NC content dual-licensed. And today, Wikia is publicizing a partnership with Sony to display Wikia content on Smart TVs, a clear commercial use.

A similar event happened at TV Tropes when the site owners single-handedly changed the site's copyright notice from ShareAlike to the incompatible NonCommercial, without notifying nor requesting consent from its contributors. Is this the ultimate fate of popular wikis? Do Creative Commons licenses hold any weight for community websites?

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by GlennC on Thursday May 29 2014, @06:40PM

    by GlennC (3656) on Thursday May 29 2014, @06:40PM (#48867)

    There are two main considerations concerning how favorable your licensing is:

    1. The amount of money you or your organization has.

    2. The quality and/or quantity of your legal representation.

    --
    Sorry folks...the world is bigger and more varied than you want it to be. Deal with it.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2