Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday August 12 2017, @06:47AM   Printer-friendly
from the 'flip'-a-coin? dept.

A blockchain-based cloud storage technology called Filecoin has already raised $52 million from investors. The company is poised to raise millions more on Thursday when it begins selling units of its bitcoin-like cryptocurrency to a larger set of wealthy investors.

Filecoin aims to disrupt conventional cloud-based storage platforms from Amazon and others. If it succeeds, the technology could be worth billions of dollars. But the company will need to overcome some significant hurdles first.

First and foremost, Filecoin's technology doesn't actually exist yet. The Filecoin team has done extensive research and planning, producing a series of white papers describing the technology it's building. But an actual, working Filecoin network is still months away. When it launches, Filecoin will compete with rival blockchain storage networks, including Sia, which has been available to the public for two years.

"Filecoin currently is just a white paper," Sia co-founder David Vorick told us earlier this week.

Have any Soylentils encountered or used blockchain storage, and if so what did you think of it?

Source: Ars Technica

Also at Medium, TechCrunch, and CoinDesk.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Fnord666 on Monday August 14 2017, @01:46PM

    by Fnord666 (652) on Monday August 14 2017, @01:46PM (#553649) Homepage

    Filecoin might be a white paper, and it is an interesting one, but the same company is behind ipfs which is very real. From what i gather the coin is a way to incentivize storage of ipfs blocks so the blockchain sees no data. In fact an ethereum token is being considered. Proof of storage is the difficult part, miners might download on demand instead of storing. Storage has timeout and payment is proportional to storage time. I will probably give it a spin, not to speculate but to trade bkp space. Using the cloud as more than backup is insane anyway.

    This is actually something that they address and is supposed to be one of the more significant breakthroughs they have made. Have a look at their "Proof of Replication" whitepaper which details how they address a number of abuse cases where miners might try to get away with not actually storing unique copies of data blocks.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2