Submitted via IRC for Bytram
It's been known for years that the oldest children in class perform better in school than their youngest classmates. But according to a new study co-authored by University of Toronto Scarborough economist Elizabeth Dhuey, that gap can persist, with older children more likely to attend post-secondary school and graduate from an elite university.
"Older children, in this case those born in early September, do better in elementary school than their younger peers," says Dhuey, whose past research has explored this phenomenon.
"What we found in this study is that gap persists throughout their school careers, so they end up being more likely to attend a post-secondary school and graduate from an elite university."
The study, by Dhuey, an associate professor of economics, and a team of three economists from U.S.-based universities, was published by the National Bureau of Economic Research. It followed differences between Florida children born just before and after the Sept. 1 cut-off date to start kindergarten. (In Ontario, the cut-off date to start kindergarten is Jan. 1.)
precocious kids need not apply
Source: https://phys.org/news/2017-09-oldest-kids-class-university.html
Reference: Elizabeth Dhuey et al. School Starting Age and Cognitive Development, (2017). DOI: 10.3386/w23660[PDF]
(Score: 2) by TheRaven on Tuesday September 12 2017, @07:28AM (1 child)
sudo mod me up
(Score: 2, Informative) by shrewdsheep on Tuesday September 12 2017, @10:49AM
Hm,... might this be post-hoc theorizing? My first reaction was to challenge the study. This question pops up from time to time and IIRC the long-term effect has been debunked in the past. TLDR, so I cannot judge the quality of the study, but to follow children to adulthood is extremely challenging and the data is subject to all of confounding, selection bias, and measurement error, implying that unless properly taken into account, study results could but reflect those phenomena.