SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Submitted via IRC for SoyCow5743
On Friday, Equifax announced that two top executives would be retiring in the aftermath of the company's massive security breach that affected 143 million Americans.
According to a press release, the company said that its Chief Information Officer, David Webb, and Chief Security Officer, Susan Mauldin, would be leaving the company immediately and were being replaced by internal staff. Mark Rohrwasser, who has lead Equifax's international IT operations, is the company's new interim CIO. Russ Ayres, who had been a vice president for IT at Equifax, has been named as the company's new interim CSO.
The notorious breach was accomplished by exploiting a Web application vulnerability that had been patched in early March 2017.
However, the company's Friday statement also noted for the first time that Equifax did not actually apply the patch to address the Apache Struts vulnerability (CVE-2017-5638) until after the breach was discovered on July 29, 2017.
Source: https://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/2017/09/equifax-cio-cso-retire-in-wake-of-huge-security-breach/
(Score: 2) by frojack on Wednesday September 20 2017, @06:58PM (1 child)
There you go with that "risk culture" nonsense again.
You haven't got a point here. Sorry. All business is risk.
All the paper pushing bean counters in the world can't avoid risk. Its part of business.
No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
(Score: 2) by arslan on Thursday September 21 2017, @12:15AM
Nobody's saying you can avoid risk, but how an organization overall deals with it is not a binary thing. The top leadership are accountable on how they want the rest of the leadership chain down react to risk (as in how it affects their decision making).
If a mid level IT manager decides that patching is low priority because he wants his project to be deployed first so he can score brownie points with his business sponsor because that is his main KPI set from the top and decides to postpone the patching, then they are potentially taking a very bad position on managing risk. The risk doesn't go away to your point - and this isn't about that. Why does the IT manager behave that way? Is this a lone-wolf cowboy thing, or is it a typical thing across the organization? Surely the top leaders are accountable to set the risk culture because they are they ones that decide on the KPI model.
Another scenario, which is not so direct, is a culture where the top leaders foster an environment where minions are always stretched to work 10 hours a day continuously till they burn out and fat fingering is par for the course. This isn't "directly" related to risk culture, but it does setup a culture where mid level IT managers gets the mandate to whip their workforce and create an environment where there's high degree of mistakes and indirectly create a poor cyber risk environment.
I've been in organization where I've experienced both the above. If shit were to happen I wouldn't be blaming the minion like you suggested.