Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday October 06, @06:42AM   Printer-friendly
from the prepare-for-a-coverup dept.

Scientists have long assumed that all the planets in our solar system look the same beneath the surface, but a study published in Geology on Oct. 4 tells a different story.

"The mantle of the earth is made mostly of a mineral called olivine, and the assumption is usually that all planets are like the Earth," said Jay Melosh, a professor of earth, atmospheric and planetary sciences at Purdue University, who led the study. "But when we look at the spectral signature of rocks exposed deep below the moon's surface, we don't see olivine; we see orthopyroxene."

Around 4 billion years ago, an asteroid collided with the moon and created the largest and deepest impact on the moon: the South Pole-Aitken basin. The collision exposed lunar mantle in the basin and splashed up material onto the far side of the moon.

Melosh's group used remote sensing to identify what minerals compose the splashed-up material. When sunlight hits the moon, it interacts with materials on the surface; because different materials absorb different wavelengths of light, researchers can tell what materials are on the surface by looking at the reflected signal.

Wallace and Gromit will be disappointed to learn it's not Stilton.

South Pole‚ÄďAitken basin ejecta reveal the Moon's upper mantle (DOI: 10.1130/G39375.1) (DX)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 06, @01:05PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 06, @01:05PM (#577981)

    Well, according to the summary, one of them is

    Jay Melosh, a professor of earth, atmospheric and planetary sciences at Purdue University, who led the study.

    Although I suspect when he said "all planets" he didn't really mean "all planets", as he surely didn't ever consider the interior of Jupiter to be even remotely like the interior of Earth.

  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Friday October 06, @07:13PM

    by bob_super (1357) on Friday October 06, @07:13PM (#578249)

    It's indeed not absurd that planets which just randomly agglomerated nearby portions of the same primordial disk of matter would have a related composition.
    The disk itself didn't have to be homogeneous, but it's quite likely that it was locally consistent in its composition.