Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by mrpg on Wednesday October 11 2017, @05:45AM   Printer-friendly

As a warming world moves from fossil fuels toward renewable solar and wind energy, industrial forecasts predict an insatiable need for battery farms to store power and provide electricity when the sky is dark and the air is still. Against that backdrop, Stanford researchers have developed a sodium-based battery that can store the same amount of energy as a state-of-the-art lithium ion, at substantially lower cost.

Chemical engineer Zhenan Bao and her faculty collaborators, materials scientists Yi Cui and William Chueh, aren't the first researchers to design a sodium ion battery. But they believe the approach they describe in an Oct. 9 Nature Energy paper has the price and performance characteristics to create a sodium ion battery costing less than 80 percent of a lithium ion battery with the same storage capacity.

"Nothing may ever surpass lithium in performance," Bao said. "But lithium is so rare and costly that we need to develop high-performance but low-cost batteries based on abundant elements like sodium."

With materials constituting about one-quarter of a battery's price, the cost of lithium – about $15,000 a ton to mine and refine – looms large. That's why the Stanford team is basing its battery on widely available sodium-based electrode material that costs just $150 a ton.

Sodium batteries taste better, too.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Whoever on Wednesday October 11 2017, @07:01AM (2 children)

    by Whoever (4524) on Wednesday October 11 2017, @07:01AM (#580324) Journal

    Reading my source again, it may be that the author of the article misunderstood Goldman-Sachs.

    The article [electrek.co] claims 63Kg of Lithium Carbonate are used and that Lithium Carbonate costs ~$15k/ton. This would put the cost of the Lithium Carbonate in a 70kWh battery at about $1000.

    So it looks like the author of the article that Phoenix666 quotes has confused Lithium with Lithium carbonate.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 1) by whibla on Friday October 13 2017, @11:48AM (1 child)

    by whibla (2352) on Friday October 13 2017, @11:48AM (#581698)
    I honestly have no idea where the author of that article is getting Lithium Carbonate from. No, scratch that, I do, and it's because he's somehow confused the formula LiCoO2 for LiCO3. There is no Lithium Carbonate in the cathode of Lithium Ion batteries. There is (for some of them) Lithium Cobalt Oxide in the anode.
    • (Score: 1) by whibla on Friday October 13 2017, @12:01PM

      by whibla (2352) on Friday October 13 2017, @12:01PM (#581703)
      On a second reading, and reflection, I may have been a little hasty in judging the author. I suspect the Lithium Carbonate he mentions might be the raw (lithium salt) material that is left after the salar brine evaporation process. My bad!