Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday October 19 2017, @10:39PM   Printer-friendly
from the some-hurtin'-dogs dept.

Several dogs from one of the top twenty finishing teams at the Iditarod Trail Sled Dog Race failed a drug test:

It's not your ordinary sports doping scandal: some dogs who mushed this year's Iditarod Trail Sled Dog Race have tested positive for the opioid pain reliever Tramadol, the event's governing board said Wednesday.

The Iditarod Trail Committee Board of Directors, which oversees the nearly 1,000-mile race, says that when dogs were tested six hours after finishing in Nome, Alaska, in March, several from one team came back positive for the drug. It is the first-ever positive result since Iditarod testing for prohibited substances began in 1994, officials said.

The Board announced last week that "a prohibited substance" had been found in some of the dogs. The latest information clarifies that it was Tramadol. The Associated Press reports that investigators estimate the drug could have been administered up to 15 hours before the test.

The rules will be changed to require mushers to prove that they did not intentionally administer drugs to their dogs in the case of a positive test. Currently, race officials are required to prove that the doping was intentional.

Tramadol.

Also at The Guardian and DW.

See Also: Routine On U.S. Racetracks, Horse Doping Is Banned In Europe
Report: Horsemen Keeping Tabs On Development Of New Human Drugs
Doped up greyhounds add to the disgrace dogging parimutuels in Florida


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Snotnose on Thursday October 19 2017, @11:29PM (9 children)

    by Snotnose (1623) on Thursday October 19 2017, @11:29PM (#584985)

    Lets face it, it's probably not good for the dog.

    That said, I'm fine watching a movie and watching someone get shot in the head. Shoot a dog in the head, or kick a cat, and I have a much more visceral reaction. I'm hoping it's because I know the guy getting shot is CGI or green screen, but not so sure about the animal.

    Then again, I could be some kind of *path, or lack empathy, or am a bad human being.

    / have a cat
    // have owned cats and dogs all my life
    /// can't imagine hurting any of them in any way (OK, cat hates the flea meds, but it's a couple drops on her neck. Stupid cat)

    --
    I came. I saw. I forgot why I came.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Thursday October 19 2017, @11:35PM (1 child)

    by bob_super (1357) on Thursday October 19 2017, @11:35PM (#584989)

    http://tvtropes.org/pmwiki/pmwiki.php/Main/KickTheDog [tvtropes.org]

    And there I thought the point of the Iditarod was to finish, and rankings didn't matter.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 20 2017, @12:24PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 20 2017, @12:24PM (#585196)

      Unilaterally putting someone's CC-BY-SA licensed work under a CC-BY-NC-SA license isn't much better than kicking a dog.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 19 2017, @11:55PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday October 19 2017, @11:55PM (#585000)

    It is because we view animals as innocent, which they almost always are. There are the occasional psycho dogs, but most times those are due to human influence. We are desensitized to hurting people, but we are overly sensitized to hurting animals. Lots of other countries don't really have this same issue.

    Not that hurting anything is good, but it is odd how drastically people protect animals in the US compared to humans. Self-loathing FTL. I say this as a dog owner who has a hard time emotionally when recalling my dog getting hit by a truck even though she's totally fine now.

    "Eh, they're human, they're probably horrible in SOME way!"

    • (Score: 1, Funny) by Ethanol-fueled on Friday October 20 2017, @01:14AM (1 child)

      by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Friday October 20 2017, @01:14AM (#585033) Homepage

      Are any of your dogs Chihuahas, pugs, French bulldogs, or Boston Terriers?

      If yes to any, then you deserve to be euthanized along with your filthy any-of-the-above animals.

      • (Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Friday October 20 2017, @05:12PM

        by Phoenix666 (552) on Friday October 20 2017, @05:12PM (#585317) Journal

        The breeds you listed make more sense in an urban setting. I prefer rottweilers, labs, and retrievers but they need room to run; cramming them into apartments and co-ops is cruel.

        Context matters.

        --
        Washington DC delenda est.
    • (Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Friday October 20 2017, @05:19PM

      by Phoenix666 (552) on Friday October 20 2017, @05:19PM (#585321) Journal

      Animals are animals. They're neutral. It's how we feel about them that matters to us. That's why some rabbits are pets, and others are food. Many people would be shocked if they knew how readily our "innocent" animals would eat us if they could. Exhibit A: pigs. Exhibit B: dogs sicced on hapless enemies of the North Korean state. Exhibit C: grandma's nice little kitties after she's died in her sleep.

      --
      Washington DC delenda est.
  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Thursday October 19 2017, @11:57PM (2 children)

    by takyon (881) <{takyon} {at} {soylentnews.org}> on Thursday October 19 2017, @11:57PM (#585001) Journal

    People have doped themselves with substances that could cause a lot more health problems than tramadol. So it's not shocking for people to administer drugs to dogs. I wonder how effective the pain killers are though. The NPR on-air story said that it helps dogs "run through the pain".

    lol: Anti-doping efforts still in their infancy in eSports [dw.com]

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by c0lo on Friday October 20 2017, @01:38AM

      by c0lo (156) on Friday October 20 2017, @01:38AM (#585040) Journal

      Who would drug dogs?

      In some cases, themselves. Dobby the dog tripping on cane toads [youtube.com]

      ---

      See also:
      - bufotenin [wikipedia.org]
      - toad licking [gizmodo.com]

      Toad licking has long been recognized as a stupid, risky way to try to get high.
      ...
      The stuff itself is called 5-methoxy-N, N-dimethyltryptamine. The chemical gets into the body and acts as a serotonin agonist, binding to serotonin receptors and releasing a lot of the feel-good substance into the body. People who take 5-methoxy-N, N-dimethyltryptamine report a full-body rush and powerful hallucinations... although notably, most people who take 5-methoxy-N, N-dimethyltryptamine, generally do so in purified form.

      As it's not much in the toad's interest to get people high, it secretes some other stuff as well. One of the chemicals it secretes probably could be used to treat people medically. It's a cardiotoxic steroid which is a close cousin to digitalis, the chemical produced by the foxglove... A toad's version of the toxin releases massive bursts of adrenalin in the person or animal that ingests it; the adrenalin first increases the heart rate and then causes fibrillation. Enough of the toxin causes irregular heartbeat, seizures, and death.

      Just as a bonus, toads secrete substances that weaken muscles and cause extreme nausea, too. So the overall effect of toad licking can cause a person to have vivid hallucinations, a racing heart, and muscles too weak to carry their constantly-vomiting body to the bathroom, let alone the hospital.

      --
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0
    • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 20 2017, @01:45AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday October 20 2017, @01:45AM (#585044)

      I'd never heard of tramadol until earlier this week -- when an elderly relative broke their arm (knife-like pain when disturbed) and this was prescribed as something a bit stronger than Tylenol. Pharmacist said it wasn't on any opioid watch lists (presumably because it's not very strong?) After two 50mg tablets taken 6 hours apart, they have sworn it off--made them too dopey and incompetent feeling, although it did work on the pain. If pain returns they might try again with half a tablet.

      One thing for sure, it is cheap -- in this case the co-pay along with a senior drug plan was 44 cents for 14 tabs.