SoylentNews Stats for 2014-06-05 UIDs IPIDs Pages total: - - 57452 (1341.1 MB) static total: - - 3822 gstatic total: - - 5972 grand total: 892 4549 59666 (1561.6 MB) secure total: - - 0 sbscrbr total: - - 0 posts: 153 219 comments: 437 1546 19402 (330.4 MB) index: 726 2319 9107 articles: 683 2860 9889 (373.1 MB) search: 11 92 209 (5.7 MB) journals: 43 98 229 (6.2 MB) users: 109 161 593 (15.9 MB) rss: 46 362 2214 (220.6 MB) other: 217 700 18023 (173.3 MB) formkeys: 487 rows total comments: 573 posted yesterday submissions: 16 submissions sub/comments: 31.2% of the submissions came from comment posters from this day not found: 4769 pages sent with status 404 (not found) total hits: 140856136 ------------------------ Yesterday | 2 days ago | 3 days ago Avg Hits Per Article: 706.4| 690.1| 629.9 Avg Comments Per Article: 30.4| 32.1| 18.4 Pages From RSS By Section ------------------------------------------------ Section Pages UIDS IPIDS Main Page 2508 87 539 For Main Page Pages IPs Bandwidth Users total: 57452 4353 1341.1 MB 885 index: 9107 2319 436.5 MB 726 comments: 19402 1546 330.4 MB 437 articles: 9889 2860 373.1 MB 683 search: 209 92 5.7 MB 11 rss: 2214 362 220.6 MB 46 other: 18023 700 173.3 MB 885 ----------------------- Top stories viewed by article.pl: 883 14/06/05/0025257 n1 First-Person Shooter Engine in 789 14/06/04/2126226 n1 Apple CEO Says Users Buy an An 708 14/06/05/0132243 n1 Seattle Approves $15 Minimum W 617 14/06/05/0121251 n1 Tesla S Road Trip Report 578 14/06/04/2131208 n1 Intel Wants Your Next PC to Ha 468 14/06/05/1256249 Woods Dwarf Fortress Update Coming N 453 14/06/04/1343246 janrinok ISPs Urged to Quarantine Infec 332 14/06/05/1418207 martyb Computer Programs Are People, 328 14/06/05/133219 Woods FBI Offers $10,000 Reward For 261 14/06/04/1329216 janrinok Underwater Sound Examined for 259 14/06/05/1419254 janrinok How to Spend $750 for One Minu 252 14/06/05/133201 LaminatorX Apple to Allow Virtual Currenc 230 14/06/04/1310212 janrinok Pixar Releasing its 3D Renderi 225 14/06/04/1337244 janrinok Vincent van Gogh's Severed Ear 217 14/06/05/1315234 LaminatorX High Brain Integration and Cre 194 14/06/04/1212207 martyb Google Trying Out End-to-End E 178 14/06/04/111243 LaminatorX Domestic Terror Task Force is 155 14/06/04/1315250 janrinok Ambulance Drones Might Appear 141 14/06/03/211257 n1 What's Lost as Handwriting Fad 139 14/06/04/1059208 LaminatorX Learning to Eat Vegetables in 125 14/06/03/2048227 n1 Battlestar Galactica Reboot 122 14/06/04/0527240 LaminatorX Windows Start Menu Won't Retur 118 14/06/05/149215 janrinok British Recording Industry Thi ----------------------- Top referers: 84 http://www.netvibes.com 67 http://feedly.com 61 http://www.google.co.uk 42 http://google.com 38 http://barrapunto.com 30 https://www.google.com 29 http://7rmath4ro2of2a42.onion 29 http://maps.google.com 27 http://www.newsblur.com 22 http://www.inoreader.com 19 http://www.protopage.com 15 http://t.co 14 http://li694-22.members.linode.com 14 http://sylnt.us 14 http://theoldreader.com 10 http://www.google.com 9 http://www.jaruzel.com 7 http://hager.pipedot.org 7 http://pi.local 6 http://www.igoogleportal.com
(Score: 5, Insightful) by Angry Jesus on Friday June 06 2014, @08:10PM
The key here, at least for me, is that there are no 3rd parties involved. All the analytics data stays with Soylent at all times. That's what the piwik FAQ says:
http://piwik.org/faq/new-to-piwik/#faq_15 [piwik.org]
How is Piwik different to Google Analytics and other web analytics tools?
Piwik is the leading open source web analytics software, but there are dozens of other free and paid web analytics solutions; why choose Piwik? One of the principle advantages of Piwik is that you are in control. Unlike remote-hosted services (such as Google Analytics), you host Piwik on your own server and the data is tracked inside your Mysql database. Because Piwik is installed on your server, you enjoy full control over your data. You can access the data easily via the Piwik APIs. Advanced users can use Custom Variables, Segmentation, or even run manual queries on the database in order to build advanced reports.
I don't use javascript so it won't affect me anyway. But, if I did use javascript I'd be OK with it.
(Score: 2) by Tramii on Friday June 06 2014, @08:13PM
Exactly, as long as you keep all the info you collect to yourself and don't involve any third parties, I'm cool with it.
(Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Friday June 06 2014, @08:14PM
My rights don't end where your fear begins.
(Score: 2) by pbnjoe on Friday June 06 2014, @08:28PM
I feel the same. Just using it to get an idea of numbers is perfectly fine, but no third parties (and no cross-site tracking etc, but that's not being proposed).
(Score: 5, Insightful) by datapharmer on Friday June 06 2014, @08:54PM
My suggestion is to keep personally identifiable data as short a time as possible, and do any matching queries against a local database (ip to geolocation lookups etc) to avoid giving a list to a 3rd party. Beyond that have fun and let us know what you find. Big data can be used for good just as much as it can be used for evil!
We know slashdot users were targeted by nsa previously; I suggest you make them cast a wide net if they must go fishing on the site.
(Score: 2) by buswolley on Friday June 06 2014, @11:07PM
N S A? really?
subicular junctures
(Score: 1) by Ethanol-fueled on Saturday June 07 2014, @12:33AM
Yeah, really. Soylent News was built to accommodate those disgruntled with increasingly corporate and establishment views, which would make it a perfect honeypot for forwarding the information potential anti-establishment malcontents to some fusion center.
Okay, so I don't believe that's true either...but you won't be able to fully convince some users no matter how hard you try.
(Score: 1) by pert.boioioing on Saturday June 07 2014, @08:27AM
Maybe NSA, maybe GCHQ... [slashdot.org]
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 07 2014, @12:18PM
Off topic so I've removed the karma bonus and gone AC, feel free to mod this post down further if you think it's worth it: I won't disagree at all (I being Yog-Yogguth but there's no way to confirm that)
Yeah [thehackernews.com]. Of course it's all a lie and nobody needs to worry about anything, it's only crazy people with their conspiracy theories (should I really have to add a sarcasm tag?).
So that's one individual that was important enough for direct measures by somebody, everyone and everything else is dumped into the "future reference" haystack on a FIFO basis. As an example IP telephony eventually ends up going to CONVEYANCE voice processing and then the NUCLEON voice repository, or so the NSA says. Nobody has made a big deal out of that particular specific yet but you can find it within the details here on the APEX VoIP Exploitation slide [firstlook.org]; what it means is that the NSA already owns the sound of the voice of quite a few people.
Because it would be very odd if they don't have enough data there to recreate the individual voices when they have enough to recognize the same voices, right? Useful for releasing audio that benefits whatever you want, maybe some politicians whose phone-call is supposed to have been bugged or maybe the replies of an airplane pilot, anything you can and want to. Conspiracy theories are useless when everything has been made possible or even plausible.
(Score: 1) by Yog-Yogguth on Saturday June 07 2014, @11:21AM
I agree with you but fail to see the point of it, aren't they're making large assumptions on the validity of any non-local data? I know it's an established industry standard to make those assumptions but I'm still lost on what they hope to gain from it and for what decisions.
Bite harder Ouroboros, bite! tails.boum.org/ linux USB CD secure desktop IRC *crypt tor (not endorsements (XKeyScore))
(Score: 3, Interesting) by SpockLogic on Friday June 06 2014, @08:15PM
OK, exactly how long will this run for?
... and when do you give the results to the NSA. No, don't answer that, I'm joking.
Overreacting is one thing, sticking your head up your ass hoping the problem goes away is another - edIII
(Score: 4, Insightful) by Sir Garlon on Friday June 06 2014, @08:22PM
And what will be your data retention policy?
[Sir Garlon] is the marvellest knight that is now living, for he destroyeth many good knights, for he goeth invisible.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 07 2014, @12:54AM
i'm surprised there's no terms of use, privacy policy, copyright notice and disclaimer already. not that it matters to me, but just sayin.
(Score: 1) by Yog-Yogguth on Saturday June 07 2014, @11:30AM
Such things are usually just meaningless legalese bs for cya anyway, however you've missed:
It's on every article page above the comments.
Bite harder Ouroboros, bite! tails.boum.org/ linux USB CD secure desktop IRC *crypt tor (not endorsements (XKeyScore))
(Score: 3, Insightful) by janrinok on Friday June 06 2014, @08:21PM
If you want to reach the majority of the community, I suggest that you pose the question when most of the community visit the site. The weekends are notorious for low numbers of submissions and page hits. And where I am it is already evening on Friday.
However, I have no objections to the use of this method of data collection.
(Score: 2) by NCommander on Friday June 06 2014, @08:41PM
And that is why it went out at 4PM on Friday, which is start of peak hours during the week :-)
Still always moving
(Score: 2) by janrinok on Friday June 06 2014, @08:46PM
I'll bet it's not peak from outside the USA though - if you are trying to find out where people are, you could try putting it out to cover a time period when everyone gets to see it. The Europeans have already gone home for the weekend, while the USA is still winding down.
(Score: 3, Informative) by captain normal on Friday June 06 2014, @09:57PM
Plus it's already Sat. eve in New Zealand, Australia, Hong Kong, Japan...etc.
When life isn't going right, go left.
(Score: 1) by Ethanol-fueled on Saturday June 07 2014, @12:38AM
Peak drinking hours during the week.
So don't be surprised if some people start posting obscenities and everybody else slobbers all over you and the other admins' nuts telling you all how you're the coolest people they've ever met.
(Score: 2) by lhsi on Monday June 09 2014, @08:50AM
Peak hours in the USA maybe...
Do I need to allow something in Ghostery to let this work? It is crossed out by default. I'm going to miss the little "0" on the icon, it was a rare occurrence when browsing the net...
(Score: 2) by NCommander on Monday June 09 2014, @09:37AM
For you to show up on the stats, you need to allow javascript, allowing the tracing image to load (this is something I didn't realize when I posted the article; it WILL get non-JS users), and allow stats.soylentnews.org to work. I won't worry about it to much.
Out of curosity, does it still say zero? The tracking code been enabled since late Saturday
Still always moving
(Score: 2) by lhsi on Monday June 09 2014, @10:05AM
It does not say 0 anymore - it says 1 (With "Piwik Analytics" crossed out). I think I have enabled it now (it still says 1 but it is no longer crossed out).
(Score: 2) by lhsi on Monday June 09 2014, @10:38AM
Have you made a change to the Piwik thing? Ghostery has gone back to "0" but I have a little shield in Chrome that says "This page includes a script from unauthenticated sources" with an option to "Load unsafe script".
I get this if I click on "Learn more": https://support.google.com/chrome/answer/1342714?hl=en-GB [google.com]
I am on the https SN, I don't know if that makes a difference.
(Score: 2) by NCommander on Monday June 09 2014, @02:03PM
We had a problem that https access would get caught up due to a misconfiguration on nitrogen (the error manifested itself as "Kerberos Authetication" boxes, since it tried to access a resource on the staff slash. I forced piwik access to http only until we can get it resolved (we need a second IP which linode just granted us). It will be restored later today, I've got new SSL certificates which will be installed in a few hours.
Still always moving
(Score: 2) by lx on Friday June 06 2014, @08:21PM
Your link to piwik.org has a typo in it.
(Score: 2) by NCommander on Friday June 06 2014, @08:41PM
*cough*
Fixed. Thanks.
Still always moving
(Score: 0, Flamebait) by kwerle on Friday June 06 2014, @08:21PM
Run it like a business. Do however many (few) lines of code it takes to integrate google analytics and get on with your life.
(Score: 2) by Ryuugami on Friday June 06 2014, @08:36PM
I'd imagine that a significant percentage of Soylent community blocks Google Analytics (and all the other third-party content & scripts), so I'm not sure that data would be all that useful. Hosting their own tracker, with a heads-up on what's going on, has a much greater chance of being accurate.
If a shit storm's on the horizon, it's good to know far enough ahead you can at least bring along an umbrella. - D.Weber
(Score: 2, Interesting) by kwerle on Saturday June 07 2014, @02:06AM
If that were a real concern (probably not) for a real percentage of the users here (probably not), then the simple solution is to implement the APIs in server-side code. Which is a little more work, but not all that much.
My advice for any tracking is that the numbers are not to be believed or used for their values (since there are all kinds of things that can inflate or deflate them), but to look at the trending as you make changes and see what's going on in relative terms.
But the bottom line is that implementing their own analytics is the kind of over-engineering soylent seems to do.
After all, it's pretty damn easy to look at how many submissions, stories, and comments are posted in absolute numbers and get a feel for what's going on.
(Score: 2) by Blackmoore on Friday June 06 2014, @08:46PM
and watch google come by to buy us out in a few years; and replace the site with ads thinly veiled as news?
i think that's why we wanted a Non-profit site; and why we shouldn't hand over data to a third party. .
(Score: 1) by kwerle on Saturday June 07 2014, @01:58AM
Yeah... That does not seem like a real thing. I'm pretty sure that google already has a news arm, and that when it buys something, it expects to get users out of it.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 07 2014, @01:37PM
Do you realize that a sizable chunk of the user population here is here because the former joint acted like a business? Fuck google or anything remote, which is what a lot of the other comments are saying as well. Some things should be either done properly or not at all, this is one of them.
(Score: 1) by meisterister on Friday June 06 2014, @08:32PM
...you allow at least registered users to look at it. I personally think that it would be awesome to look at the raw data and graph the trends seen over time. It would be neat to see how quickly the site is growing, as well as what articles generate the most feedback. I do share other people's concern over selling the data, however.
(May or may not have been) Posted from my K6-2, Athlon XP, or Pentium I/II/III.
(Score: 3, Interesting) by NCommander on Friday June 06 2014, @08:49PM
We may do something like this in the future, but at least for the time being, we're going to limit it to staff only to make sure we don't leak personal information. Right now, this came up because we're trying to work out real numbers for stuff relating to incorporation.
Still always moving
(Score: 2) by c0lo on Friday June 06 2014, @10:46PM
Call me pedantic (or paranoid) if you like, but I need to ask.
When you say "We may do something like this in the future", you are answering to which of the points raised by GP:
Thanks in advance for a candid answer.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
(Score: 2) by buswolley on Friday June 06 2014, @11:09PM
Do you see my eyes rolling?
subicular junctures
(Score: 3, Informative) by Nesh on Friday June 06 2014, @08:35PM
yes to piwik. No to third-parties (this includes google). Third parties get blocked by requestpolicy anyway.
(Score: 5, Informative) by Horse With Stripes on Friday June 06 2014, @08:36PM
We use piwik for visitor information on our sites. It works well, though it requires visitors to allow cookies in order to accurately count unique visitors and it requires javascript to function. Our community has a higher than average number of members that block one or both.
(Score: 1) by Lazarus on Friday June 06 2014, @08:37PM
I have nothing to contribute to your tracking project, but just want to congratulate you on the level of traffic that you're currently monitoring from signed-in users. That's very impressive for a site that's this new.
(Score: 3, Informative) by bradley13 on Friday June 06 2014, @08:50PM
I almost always start as an AC; I have to explicitly log in every time. Dunno why - I don't have this problem at /. or other sites, but at Soylent the cookies don't work for me. Assuming I am not alone, this means that you are right: your stats are borked, because lots of time people just want a quick look and won't bother to log in.
I see no problem with stats collection, because it isn't going through third parties. But you'll see more AC and fewer registered users until the cookie problems are solved.
Everyone is somebody else's weirdo.
(Score: 2) by NCommander on Friday June 06 2014, @09:13PM
I'm looking at trying to get this fixed soonish, as I've got some time this weekend.
Still always moving
(Score: 3, Informative) by captain normal on Friday June 06 2014, @10:08PM
I see NC has said he was working on it. Just want to note to bradley that if you (like me) use several different IPs and/or use a mobile connection most of the time, you do have to log back in on each change of IP.
When life isn't going right, go left.
(Score: 1) by paulej72 on Friday June 06 2014, @11:42PM
What happens if you change you password preferences so that your login cookie is valid everywhere instead of default of your subnet?
Team Leader for SN Development
(Score: 2) by captain normal on Saturday June 07 2014, @04:55AM
Never thought of that. Thanks for the suggestion. I'll give it a shot.
When life isn't going right, go left.
(Score: 2) by bradley13 on Saturday June 07 2014, @07:03AM
As with most software problems, the solution is what we lovingly refer to as "RRU" (Remove and Replace User). Maybe there aren't any cookie problems...
I had never noticed that option restricting cookies to a single subnet. We have a load-balancing router that goes out over two different IP addresses. Presumably, every time it swapped connections on my I was logged out. I've now changed cookie validity to "everywhere" and that will presumably solve my problems...
Everyone is somebody else's weirdo.
(Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 06 2014, @08:50PM
Oh my goodness. It's a web site -- run it like a web site. People who are allergic to 3rd party tools can block them very easily.
You do NOT need users' permission to install a piece of back end server software to monitor your own traffic!
It is unbelievable how much attention is being paid to things that don't matter in the least (whether a 501(c)(3) is quite good enough, what state the admin should live in, whether it's "okay" to install a piece of server software, a site motto), but hugely important things like the site's nearly unusable design and truly terrible domain name are left to fester. (And no, unfortunately the new "+" features to expand comments are not significantly better from an ease-of-use or information density point of view. The site name is really sad and inappropriate, and even the owner doesn't like it. Just crazy.)
You are not wed to the whims of your current fickle audience -- make the RIGHT decisions.
(Score: 4, Informative) by martyb on Friday June 06 2014, @09:28PM
Thanks for your feedback. From the earlier comments in this discussion, it appears that many here appreciate our openness. That you do not wish to receive so much information is well noted. Thank you for speaking up. We DO listen! But there is a wide-ranging community here, and we would rather err on the side of being too open, rather than making decisions from above to the consternation of the community. That is, in large part, why this whole community got started in the first place.
There is much more that happens "behind the scenes" and we strive for openness and buy-in. We realize it may inconvenience or even bother a few here. We cannot please everyone.
So, your comment is well noted, we will keep it in mind when assessing what level of things we should put out to the community for input.
And, as an interesting side point, the fortune at the bottom of the page at the time of writing this was: "Do nothing unless you must, and when you must act -- hesitate."
Wit is intellect, dancing.
(Score: 2) by edIII on Friday June 06 2014, @10:03PM
I have a dissenting opinion about whether or not you need to ask to run javascript designed for tracking, as I'm sure others do as well. It's really nice to have the transparency.
As long as it's not 3rd party, and the traffic is sent back to your server, I don't feel that I'm losing all that much privacy.
I'll add the exception to allow the tracker, although I'm logged in, so I don't see what extra information you will receive.
Technically, lunchtime is at any moment. It's just a wave function.
(Score: 4, Insightful) by frojack on Friday June 06 2014, @09:39PM
He had the decency to ask. As he should have. After all he's the same guy that posted this tirade. [soylentnews.org]
Nearly unusable design? The hell you say!
And the terrible domain name was voted it.
Sorry, you should have spoken up sooner, I'm sure we would have all immediately changed our votes had we only known that YOU didn't like it.
No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
(Score: 2, Interesting) by anubi on Saturday June 07 2014, @01:36AM
Shakespeare would have it that a rose by any other name would still smell as sweet...
Personally, after seeing the list of suggested names, I thought "DotStar" was the best. SoylentNews is fine with me too.
The fact this site exists and is run by competent people even more worked up than I am over the sorry state of affairs in our internet community is what is by far most important to me. They are running this as an open forum so anyone can come over here and run something up the flagpole and see if anyone else salutes.
That alone is unliked by those who want to shanghai us into a steady diet of prepared propaganda.
"Prove all things; hold fast that which is good." [KJV: I Thessalonians 5:21]
(Score: 5, Insightful) by tathra on Friday June 06 2014, @09:44PM
except in this case, the community is the entire reason for the site. the admins and editors are here to serve us, not the other way around (as a side note, this is how government by democracy is supposed to work - the government is there for the people, not vice versa). there is no "audience" at this site because the community is providing the stories and comments, rather than being spoonfed prose from one or several people like on a blog or newspaper site.
the right decision is absolutely asking the community for their thoughts and input on the matter.
(Score: 2) by Open4D on Saturday June 07 2014, @10:23AM
Well, I wouldn't put it quite like that! But I do agree with your general point.
(Score: 2) by Bot on Saturday June 07 2014, @08:14PM
> the site's nearly unusable design
this guy is suggesting a soylent beta...
> and truly terrible domain name
terrible maybe, but easy to remember*
* disclaimer: I had seen the movie and got the slogan. Also, bots have rather good memory.
Account abandoned.
(Score: 1) by biff on Friday June 06 2014, @11:03PM
I use it on my site, where I wanted an analytics package that didn't "share information" beyond my site. It doesn't strike me as that different from running analytics over an access log, except that it can pick up some additional useful information like browser dimensions and can with a bit of effort track and graph specific activities like "posted comment", which can help determine things like when your users are more likely to be skimming and when they're more engaged.
(Score: 4, Interesting) by c0lo on Friday June 06 2014, @11:08PM
I'm seeing various questions and position being raised on the area of "How" (implementation and post-implementation), I'd like to hear more details in the area of "Why" - what is the reason behind the action of getting the number of non-logged-in visitors?
What is hindered or impacted by the lack of those numbers?
(to other-than-the-tech/editorial-team SN mates: please hold your horses and refrain from posting your assumptions. This is an open question, take it at the face value. I have no hidden agenda nor do I want to imply anything).
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
(Score: 4, Informative) by NCommander on Saturday June 07 2014, @12:43AM
We're trying to work out specifically how large our community is in terms of individual users, locations, and so forth. Furthermore, we're working out rough numbers on what we may reasonably expect to see via subscriber-ship (a post on this is forthcoming) and if need be, what sort of revenue adversing may bring in if we're forced to run it. Part of our incorporation process is having a business plan put together, and knowing what we can expect to see cash in vs. cash out.
On a more border category, we're also just plain old curious, and I'd like to know how much of our userbase uses Windows, Mac OS X, or Linux, where are folks, etc.
Still always moving
(Score: 2) by c0lo on Saturday June 07 2014, @01:05AM
In the forthcoming post, may I kindly ask you to state your estimations (both the most conservative and the most exuberant) in regards with operational/enhancement costs?
If it can be reasonably helped, I'd be happy to avoid a dependency on the advertising generated income.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
(Score: 2) by NCommander on Saturday June 07 2014, @01:59AM
We've got some very rough estimates based on what we're planning and what we can expect, and the numbers we came up fell short. What I plan to do is implement a box that people can pledge for the subscriber level they want, and then we can use those for more reasonable numbers (maybe something I can implement over the weekend) instead our guessaments. This should get a more reasonable idea of what we can expect, but we need to evaluate all options.
If we're going to run ads here, there will be plenty of forewarning and discussion.
Still always moving
(Score: 2) by Lagg on Saturday June 07 2014, @02:25AM
Piwik is pretty much the only analytics thing I don't dislike because of the self-hosted nature and decent features. So as far as that goes I don't care. I wish more people would do this in fact because it'd be better for both parties. Them because my script blocker doesn't catch it and me because I can contribute data without it being given to google or whoever else so long as the server's party doesn't go off and sell it somehow.
Advertising is what concerns me though, remember: Even though I'll give serious thought to paying into subscription I do run an ad and script blocker and if your ads are non-text third party content I'll likely not see them. I might not see them anyway if the script is ran from something I've blacklisted. So try to either sell ad space directly or use a third party that isn't google. Also note that when I say "I" I really mean "users like me" and given that you have not only people prone to being stubborn about scripts but also people who migrated from slashdot because of similar bullshit I don't envy your position NC, and will try my best to contribute financially despite not being a man of much means. Also be sure to emphasize the benefits of paid subscription in an obvious manner in the same way other non-profits do for donations. Slashdot and other sites that do this kind of thing made a huge mistake not doing that and as much as it might irritate people to say this, I think you should take cues from the reddit gold model. They're doing it pretty right.
http://lagg.me [lagg.me] 🗿
(Score: 2) by c0lo on Saturday June 07 2014, @04:01AM
I would love (can't wait?) to see some details of your forecasting.
Cool. If you also give course to my suggestion on disclosing some estimates on the operational+future enhancement cost, you may find in a situation very similar with the initiation of a crowd-funding action, except you use the very site you want to maintain for raising the funds (no commissions to pay to Kickstarter/IndieGoGo, only some commissions to pay for the "online merchant account" services - you won't avoid them anyway).
---
Endnotes
(for example - and with a face value limited to an example, don't take it as a suggestion for a payment processor - PayPal already offers [paypal.com] crowdfunding. Other may as well)
(yes, I know, you need to be incorporated to start receiving funds and you need some numbers to proceed with the incorporation. But, I think a scenario like the below would be acceptable/feasible:
)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
(Score: 2) by frojack on Saturday June 07 2014, @03:22AM
On any given day, you would likely see me showing up from a hand full of different IPs, using Linux, Windows, OpenBSD, and three different versions of Android.
How would that help you in a business plan?
I can see counting users, and attempting to unduplicate the anonymous cowards, and maybe determine which continent, but beyond that, it gets pretty sketchy.
If I come up on my android device on LTE, for example, my IP may vary from Florida to Phoenix, or Seattle, depending on where my carrier happens to have the most free bandwidth to dump that page request onto the net.
No, you are mistaken. I've always had this sig.
(Score: 2) by useless on Friday June 06 2014, @11:25PM
Sounds reasonable to me. Just make an announcement when it's live so people can remember to white-list it.
(Score: 1) by ankh on Saturday June 07 2014, @04:29AM
Sounds reasonable to me too
And definitely: explain how it gets blocked, by whatever tools block this sort of thing, and how to white-list it.
(Score: 1) by idetuxs on Saturday June 07 2014, @12:11AM
I've already white-listed SN in Noscript and AdblockPlus. Surprisingly don't need to with RequestPolicy.
Even more, as it's piwik, it should be fine for most of the readers as they mention in the comments, since it doesn't get third parties in the way and is GPL
Cheers
(Score: 3, Interesting) by cmn32480 on Saturday June 07 2014, @01:35AM
I commend you for being open about wanting some basic usage data and about specifically what you are going to collect.
Put up a banner that tells us with the link to this post, as you described and I bet most folks here are good with that.
Personally, while I would find the data interesting, it should be scrubbed before the general public can get to it.
As a suggestion, the only way to really track growth is to enable it and let it run. You can say that you want to let it run for a few weeks to get a reasonable idea, but to be able to accurately track growth, and to see if there is a period that is an anomaly due to a few stories that gather a lot of comments (for instance, the headlines about the changes in the site and the progress toward the non-profit status seem to garner very large numbers of comments) you need to install it, and just let it run. This will give you some decent data and much like my MRTG (http://oss.oetiker.ch/mrtg/ [oetiker.ch]), it gives a baseline to see when something happens and you suddenly get a clue if something might be going wrong if numbers drop off or suddenly spike.
For the long term (which is what we all seem to be in this for), it is a tool to see ongoing site stats and it will give a better idea then just looking at a relative snapshot of a few weeks every so often.
"It's a dog eat dog world, and I'm wearing Milkbone underwear" - Norm Peterson
(Score: 1) by albert on Saturday June 07 2014, @01:43AM
Odd day of the month: run stats
Even day of the month: no stats
(Score: 1) by kbahey on Saturday June 07 2014, @01:40AM
I reiterate what has been said, i.e. that the information stays within SoylentNews and is not shared with marketers or any other third party.
However, it requires Javascript, and therefore will track only those who have Javascript enabled.
One reason I came here from Slashdot, is that the abomination that is Beta requires Javascript, and I browse with Javascript off for performance, privacy and security reasons.
2bits.com, Inc: Drupal, WordPress, and LAMP performance tuning [2bits.com].
(Score: 2) by NCommander on Saturday June 07 2014, @02:02AM
Generally, those with Javascript disabled are those who would have the most issue with being tracked even for our own internal purposes. There are other ways to collect information from piwik such as hidden image but my rough guess is less than 1-2% disable javascript on the site, so the numbers by and large would be accurate.
My thought is if you don't run JS, you don't want to be tracked, and don't want to be executing foreign code. I can respect that, and this provides a nice middle ground.
Still always moving
(Score: 1) by kbahey on Saturday June 07 2014, @02:07AM
Don't like to be tracked nor have foreign code executed. But more importantly and more practically, I don't want my CPU usage going up and the fan whirring just because there is crappy code on many sites. Mainly it is Flash stuff, but that often gets loaded via Javascript from ad servers.
2bits.com, Inc: Drupal, WordPress, and LAMP performance tuning [2bits.com].
(Score: 2) by Angry Jesus on Saturday June 07 2014, @02:37PM
> My thought is if you don't run JS, you don't want to be tracked, and don't want to be executing foreign code.
FWIW, the overwhelming reason I disable javascript is to avoid malware. For all intents and purposes, every browser exploit over the last 15 years has had javascript as a necessary component. Completely self-hosting exploits (like a corrupt gif that does a stack-smash on the gif parser) can be counted with the fingers on one hand. Disabling javascript protects against malware served from 3rd parties like ad networks as well as if the site itself has been secretly compromised.
The plugin I use to avoid data-stalking is primarily requestpolicy [requestpolicy.com] which stops cross-site requests so that whether it is a simple web-bug or a giant set of javascript functions, my browser doesn't even load them.
I'd like to think I'm not unique in making this analysis and that most people who disable javascript do it for security first. So I hope you will take that perspective into account when thinking about improvements to soylent -- the temptation to start using javascript is very strong and it is easy to believe that soylent's own server will always be trustworthy. But having a site's own server hacked to install drive-by malware is a very common attack, so trusting javascript from any source is a security risk.
(Score: 1) by Solaarius on Saturday June 07 2014, @02:50AM
ps. Thanks for asking.
(Score: 2) by Common Joe on Saturday June 07 2014, @05:17AM
I was having split feelings until I saw this comment. Every word of Solaarius is 100% correct. Very well crafted response.
What problems do I have against y'all collecting info? I don't like government snooping and I don't like businesses snooping and selling my info.
I live in Germany and I know it isn't just the NSA that is looking at my packets. (Especially since it isn't https.) The European government is too. So, from a governmental standpoint, it doesn't matter if the three letter agencies know I'm visiting Soylent News. They already know. I have no doubt the ISPs collects the info and sells it. Can't prove it, but why wouldn't they?
Which leaves the question: After you encrypt the packets, what can your database collect and eventually sell? (It will happen. Even if it takes 50 or 75 years, but all organizations change over time for the worse.) Can we not collect that data? What is most important to me is that I retain power over my Common Joe persona so that I can make opinions without it affecting me in my real life when job hunting or making friends. I even have a second persona on Soylent News so that I can keep a second part of my life separate from Common Joe. The other persona comments about other things that Common Joe wouldn't. They are one of several facades I try to maintain across the Internet and I don't like people tearing down those facades. (I was courteous. The other facade is a 4 digit UID. I purposely didn't take all the good numbers. I'm not cruel.)
From a user perspective, I hate the idea of you collecting data, but from an admin perspective, I understand the desire for it. As Solaarius said: Thanks for asking. I like you guys.
(Score: 2) by Hyper on Saturday June 07 2014, @03:42AM
Your proposal is very good, thank you for asking. A permalink to site stats and data retention policy on the front page (footer?) would be appreciated.
(Score: 1) by fleg on Saturday June 07 2014, @04:12AM
with me.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 07 2014, @09:22AM
I browse SN regularly with my phone using a browser that retrieves the page through a proxy somewhere in India, I think. No Javascript, no cookies. Your solution won't work with me.
(Score: 1) by mrMagoo on Saturday June 07 2014, @10:37AM
If I was worried about being tracked, I wouldn't be on the Internet.
"Good judgment comes from experience. Experience comes from bad judgment." -Originally attributed to Nasrudin
(Score: 1) by quixote on Saturday June 07 2014, @02:51PM
I agree with others that transparency and no (non-this-specific-purpose-directed) data retention are key. That said, since I'm logged in, maybe I shouldn't speak for ACs?
(I use piwik on my own site. How could I object? :D )
(Score: 1) by bzipitidoo on Saturday June 07 2014, @06:08PM
This seems a question about 2 related things. Statistics is only the surface. It's really about how to fund a news web site, and how to keep it honest, keep it from degenerating into a propaganda organ. How to do that I don't know.
It is amazing and scary just how badly compromised much of our news reporting is these days. An example of this is the treatment of Noam Chomsky. Mostly, he is simply ignored. His writings appear only in fringy sorts of Internet sites. At first read, he seems like he could be a lunatic. That seems a more likely proposition than that all of mainstream media is so badly corrupted that they could and would slant coverage of major events like the current mess in the Ukraine. The mainstream media take on the Ukraine is that Russia has reverted to form, the evil empire is back and eager to expand. And Putin has irrationally decided he just plain doesn't like the West anymore, if he ever did to start with. He doesn't have any good reason for this, it's all about greed and glory. This narrative doesn't pass the smell test. It's also very dangerous. What if Putin decides he can't shake this image, can't get a fair hearing in the western media? If he's painted as a bastard no matter what, why even try to be nice? What isn't reported is that the US engineered the coup in the Ukraine, putting in power these ultranationalists who are so extreme even many Nazis didn't want to associate with them. It is these extremists and their attempt to purge the Ukraine of all Russian people that pushed matters to the point that large sections of the country went into open rebellion. That story makes a lot more sense than the mainstream media line of basically "stuff happens", and that the fighting broke out just because, and then Russia seized on it as an opportunity and made things worse. It happened because it's man's nature to fight, or some such implication.
Our media has meekly gone along with other propaganda campaigns, like the smearing of the leftist government of Venezuela as economic incompetents, crazy business bashing thieves of the rich, and so on. Why? Follow the money.
As to funding, the trouble I've had with ads, and why I always end up just blocking everything, is that they always push too far. I don't mind a few ads, I really don't. I do mind when a significant % of my bandwidth is being used for extremely annoying, loud video advertisements, or ads that cover what I'm trying to read, or distract me with constant flashing of bright colors and motion. Marketing bosses haven't figured out that getting in people's faces is suicide. Or they just don't care, so long as they can count an ad blocked the same as an ad read, and have their bogus numbers accepted by clients.
Even ones that pledge not to do disruptive advertising don't take that far enough when they look away from less scrupulous operators. CAN-SPAM is a case in point. It's an acknowledgement that spam emailers go too far. But the first version actually winked at the problem. It seemed more like a power play by bigger, more established advertisers to squeeze out competition.
(Score: 2) by NCommander on Monday June 09 2014, @02:16PM
For any ads thing, we're going to poll the community for recommendations on ad networks, as well as give anyone "first dibs" to buy adspace on us which we can fully manage. Subscribers will be able to turn off ads (since they'll be helping to fund the site), and perhaps high-karma users as well, for their contributions. Unfortunately, Google seems to have really taken over this area, and while there are still a few other ad companies, none of them seem to great towards user's privacy and such. I'd love to be proven wrong.
Still always moving
(Score: 2) by Appalbarry on Saturday June 07 2014, @09:31PM
Seriously, you need this kind of data for planning and for some eventual monetization to pay the bills.
Ultimately it comes down to trust. Just as I (perhaps foolishly) trust Google with my e-mail and data because I (mostly, although less every day) trust them, I go to great lengths to keep my Facebook account unattached to anything, and fill it with bogus information.
In this case I tend to trust you guys implicitly until you prove me wrong.
Besides - there's not much here that I think has great privacy implications for me.
(Score: 2) by monster on Monday June 09 2014, @09:15AM
I'm OK with this, but have a question about respecting the DNT setting:
I use DNT. I also want to help with this movement, and since it isn't using third party scripts it would fit nicely with my whitelisting of Javascript for SN, but if you select to respect the DNT setting I'm faced with two nonpleasant options:
- Keep my configuration as is, and not be part of the data collecting.
- Disable DNT and loss whatever protection for my privacy I'm actually getting, given that it's a global option and not per-site.
I'm not saying that there is a perfect solution, but it would be nice if we could find a good option for everyone, as I'm sure I'm not the only one with this setup.
(Score: 2) by NCommander on Monday June 09 2014, @02:06PM
I won't worry about it too much. DNT is unfortunate its an all or nothing (noscript actually forces it on all the time unless the plugin is physcally uninstalled) so we're aware that its somewhat of an issue. We're working on rough numbers, not a perfect/accurate count :-)
Still always moving
(Score: 1) by Max Hyre on Monday June 09 2014, @05:42PM
BTW, as described, I'm completely cool with it.