Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by cmn32480 on Thursday November 02 2017, @05:57PM   Printer-friendly
from the maybe-they-only-surveyed-the-nimnobs dept.

Why can we talk about PISA results, comparing the performance of students in school, but we are not allowed to talk about differences in IQ? Bring this subject up, and you are immediately accused of racism. And yet. And yet, if there are substantial differences in intellectual capability, might this not explain some of the world's problems?

An update of a massive "study of studies" is underway; this article summarizes the work to date, and provides links to the work in progress. A quick summary of the answers to the questions no one dares ask:

  • Eastern Asia (Japan, China): IQ around 105
  • Europe/North America: IQ around 98
  • Middle East: IQ around 85
  • Africa: IQ around 70

In the first instance, it doesn't even matter why there are differences. They may be genetic, or disease related, or nutrition related, or something else. If these differences are real (and the evidence is pretty strong that they are), then we need to deal with them. Imagine if the low IQs in Africa turn out to be fixable - what would the impact be, if we could raise the IQ of an entire continent by 30 points?!

Sticking our collective heads in the sand, because the topic is not PC, is not going to solve any problems.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by aristarchus on Thursday November 02 2017, @08:56PM (2 children)

    by aristarchus (2645) on Thursday November 02 2017, @08:56PM (#591334) Journal

    IQ tests do tell us something, they tell us who the racists are. Now we know, with verifiable repeatable factual data, that bradley11 is in fact a racist. It was only suspected before, but now we know. And now that we know, I would suggest we think twice before putting racist shit on the front page. Soylent lives matter! We do not want people thinking this site is a hive of scum and villainy, infested with racists and Buzzards.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Flamebait=2, Troll=1, Insightful=4, Funny=1, Overrated=1, Touché=1, Total=10
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 02 2017, @09:19PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday November 02 2017, @09:19PM (#591352)

    We may not want that but good luck preventing people from forming that opinion. Source: this article's commentary.

  • (Score: 4, Touché) by turgid on Thursday November 02 2017, @10:33PM

    by turgid (4318) Subscriber Badge on Thursday November 02 2017, @10:33PM (#591388) Journal

    Society is holding a mirror up to itself and it isn't pretty. Unfortunately, the majority can't see through the thick makeup yet.