Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday November 09 2017, @06:23PM   Printer-friendly
from the "number-of-the-beast"-is-natural,-whole,-rational,-real,-AND-imaginary dept.

Religious beliefs are not linked to intuition or rational thinking, according to new research by the universities of Coventry and Oxford. Previous studies have suggested people who hold strong religious beliefs are more intuitive and less analytical, and when they think more analytically their religious beliefs decrease.

But new research, by academics from Coventry University's Centre for Advances in Behavioural Science and neuroscientists and philosophers at Oxford University, suggests that is not the case, and that people are not 'born believers'. The study -- which included tests on pilgrims taking part in the famous Camino de Santiago and a brain stimulation experiment -- found no link between intuitive/analytical thinking, or cognitive inhibition (an ability to suppress unwanted thoughts and actions), and supernatural beliefs.

Instead, the academics conclude that other factors, such as upbringing and socio-cultural processes, are more likely to play a greater role in religious beliefs.

[Abstract]: Supernatural Belief Is Not Modulated by Intuitive Thinking Style or Cognitive Inhibition

Would you agree with this conclusion or do you believe that there is something else that influences people's religious beliefs ?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by SomeGuy on Friday November 10 2017, @12:01AM

    by SomeGuy (5632) on Friday November 10 2017, @12:01AM (#594923)

    As an atheist I don't feel the need to prove anything, as I am making no claims.

    As an atheist (or apparently I pedantically become anti-theist the moment I open my mouth) I'm going to go out on a limb:

    THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS GOD!

    "Oh, but you can't prove absolutely, whaaa, bitch, bitch, whine whine!". Screw them, I'll stop saying that there absolutely is not one the moment all of these religious idiots stop saying there absolutely *is* one.

    As far as I am concerned it's the religious who should be offering proof, and as some of their claims are pretty extraordinary, so should their proof be.

    For a split second, almost laughed my ass off imagining them actually trying to do that.

    Of course their "proof" always boils down to "my mommy said so", "it says so in that 2000 year old book of gibberish", "I'm crazy and hear voices", or "it has electrolytes, it's what plants crave".

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2