Religious beliefs are not linked to intuition or rational thinking, according to new research by the universities of Coventry and Oxford. Previous studies have suggested people who hold strong religious beliefs are more intuitive and less analytical, and when they think more analytically their religious beliefs decrease.
But new research, by academics from Coventry University's Centre for Advances in Behavioural Science and neuroscientists and philosophers at Oxford University, suggests that is not the case, and that people are not 'born believers'. The study -- which included tests on pilgrims taking part in the famous Camino de Santiago and a brain stimulation experiment -- found no link between intuitive/analytical thinking, or cognitive inhibition (an ability to suppress unwanted thoughts and actions), and supernatural beliefs.
Instead, the academics conclude that other factors, such as upbringing and socio-cultural processes, are more likely to play a greater role in religious beliefs.
[Abstract]: Supernatural Belief Is Not Modulated by Intuitive Thinking Style or Cognitive Inhibition
Would you agree with this conclusion or do you believe that there is something else that influences people's religious beliefs ?
(Score: 2) by maxwell demon on Friday November 10 2017, @03:48AM
Indeed, experiments show that our mind tends to make up patterns where there are none (the experiment involved buttons top press to get a lamp light up; in truth the lamp was lit or not randomly, independent of which button you pressed). All people in the experiment "found" rules on which buttons to press; when told there were no rules, many were convinced they discovered a regularity even the experimenters didn't know about. Truth was, the buttons were not even connected.
Sorry, can't give a link as it is something I've read a long time ago in some book, and I can't find a link on web search (maybe it's just my search fu is lacking).
The Tao of math: The numbers you can count are not the real numbers.