Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Thursday November 09 2017, @06:23PM   Printer-friendly
from the "number-of-the-beast"-is-natural,-whole,-rational,-real,-AND-imaginary dept.

Religious beliefs are not linked to intuition or rational thinking, according to new research by the universities of Coventry and Oxford. Previous studies have suggested people who hold strong religious beliefs are more intuitive and less analytical, and when they think more analytically their religious beliefs decrease.

But new research, by academics from Coventry University's Centre for Advances in Behavioural Science and neuroscientists and philosophers at Oxford University, suggests that is not the case, and that people are not 'born believers'. The study -- which included tests on pilgrims taking part in the famous Camino de Santiago and a brain stimulation experiment -- found no link between intuitive/analytical thinking, or cognitive inhibition (an ability to suppress unwanted thoughts and actions), and supernatural beliefs.

Instead, the academics conclude that other factors, such as upbringing and socio-cultural processes, are more likely to play a greater role in religious beliefs.

[Abstract]: Supernatural Belief Is Not Modulated by Intuitive Thinking Style or Cognitive Inhibition

Would you agree with this conclusion or do you believe that there is something else that influences people's religious beliefs ?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by marcello_dl on Friday November 10 2017, @12:18PM

    by marcello_dl (2685) on Friday November 10 2017, @12:18PM (#595094)

    An interesting post. Of course it starts from the implicit premise that all religion is about social control, to conclude that all religion is about social control, through a post-facto analysis of a selected sample of popular religion based power structures, but there is something to be said nonetheless.

    A big problem I see is "The religion must affect all aspects of life" spoken as if it were not a natural and inescapable result of being religious with no hypocrisy. Even if your religion is no-religion, your no-religion is about the meaning of your existence (random existence with no meaning, or adhering by choice to a system of values chosen according to your preferences), so everything you do should takes that into account.

    It is funny you speak about no temporary escape because the atheist consumerist society with its 24/7 culture is the one which implements just that, while the most religion accepting culture, which has been pre christian Rome, had more holidays than work days.

    Another big problem "No education or discovery may be permitted to contradict the religion" because if your religion is indeed about the supernatural creator, there is no way educations or discoveries can contradict it, given that no discovery can prove anything outside the domain where it has been defined and no education can discriminate between beliefs none of which is provable.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2