Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 15 submissions in the queue.
posted by n1 on Sunday June 08 2014, @06:37PM   Printer-friendly
from the unique-series-of-mistakes dept.

James R. Healey reports that General Motors has fired 15 people who either were incompetent or irresponsible in their actions involving fatally flawed ignition switches that are linked to 13 deaths in crashes where airbags failed to inflate. "A disproportionate number of those were in senior roles or executives," said GM CEO Mary Barra. Two high-ranking engineers previously put on paid leave were among them, said Barra adding that five more employees "one level removed" were disciplined in unspecified ways because they "simply didn't take action."

A far back as 2002, General Motors engineers starting calling it the "switch from hell" but it would take a dozen years, more than 50 crashes and at least 13 deaths for the automaker to recall the ignition switch, used in millions of small cars. GM's own internal investigation never explains how a lone engineer in a global automaker could approve a less expensive part that failed to meet GM standards. Nor does it illuminate why the same engineer could substitute an improved design without changing the part number, a move critics cite as evidence of a cover-up. After the first cars with the switch went on sale, GM heard complaints from customers, employees and dealers. But "group after group and committee after committee within GM that reviewed the issue failed to take action or acted too slowly," the report said. A unique series of mistakes was made," said Barra. And the problem was misunderstood to be one of owner satisfaction and not safety. GM engineers didn't understand that when the switches failed, they cut power to the airbags.

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 08 2014, @09:01PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 08 2014, @09:01PM (#53029)

    it's our attempts to hold others responsible at *all costs* that contributes to this problem

    Bullshit.
    The GM engineer knew there was a problem and he covered it up.
    GM's system didn't review his work and didn't find the giant pile of irregularities.
    This chain of events is the result of an MBA's cost/benefit calculation, based on distorted values.

    In contrast, there is an all-volunteer project that produces better work with a greater sense of responsibility than the multi-$billion for-profit operation engaged in criminal activity.
    The reason for the excellence is that the head guy is a fanatic about quality [google.com] and the meme percolates down through the ranks.

    13 deaths out of millions of vehicles is very near zero

    You assign a low value to the lives of other humans.
    Maybe someone here knows the proper term for that kind of personality.
    Just how close to you would a tragedy have to be for you to feel empathy?

    ...and if a jury decided that the value of a human life was $27B, you can bet there would be a change of tune in the cost analysis of corporations.
    In case it's not obvious, I'm in favor of a corporate death penalty.

    --gewg_

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1