Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Computer-Resistant Chess Variants

posted by mattie_p on Saturday February 22 2014, @03:00PM   Printer-friendly
from the computer-resists-you dept.

andrew writes: "Over the last decade, computers have been able to dominate human chess players. in that time attention has shifted from creating anti-computer strategies to creating computer-resistant chess variants. The inventor of one such game, Arimraa, has an interesting article on Chessbase.com about what it takes to make a board game in which it is still possible for the best human players to remain competitive against computer software."

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Computer-Resistant Chess Variants | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 32 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: 2, Interesting) by regift_of_the_gods on Saturday February 22 2014, @05:27PM

    by regift_of_the_gods (138) on Saturday February 22 2014, @05:27PM (#4878)

    By now it's pretty obvious that if you allow unlimited hardware, humans will lose.

    How about a "Man vs. Small Machine" competition where the machine is restricted to be commodity hardware, e.g. a Playstation 4 or an Xbox One with no custom hardware and no use of the GPU except for video; or an equivalent machine based on the AMD Jaguar chip used by those game consoles.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=2, Overrated=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Total Score:   2  

  • (Score: 5, Funny) by andrew on Saturday February 22 2014, @05:57PM

    by andrew (755) on Saturday February 22 2014, @05:57PM (#4886)

    I still lose to my goddamn smart phone.

  • (Score: 1) by drgibbon on Saturday February 22 2014, @06:17PM

    by drgibbon (74) on Saturday February 22 2014, @06:17PM (#4898) Journal

    At chess, yes. But humans still beat the best Go and Arimaa programs pretty easily.

    --
    Certified Soylent Fresh!

  • (Score: 4, Informative) by wjwlsn on Saturday February 22 2014, @06:38PM

    by wjwlsn (171) on Saturday February 22 2014, @06:38PM (#4909) Homepage Journal

    I like the idea of human+computer pairs playing chess against each other. Vernon Vinge talked about this in some of his fiction (e.g., "The Peace War") and Gary Kasparov popularized a form of this as "Advanced Chess":

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Advanced_Chess [wikipedia.org]

    --
    I am a traveler of both time and space. Duh.

  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by jcd on Saturday February 22 2014, @08:32PM

    by jcd (883) on Saturday February 22 2014, @08:32PM (#4941)

    This is exactly why I don't really understand trying to compete against a supercomputer at something that's math/strategy based. What about something more unique? Like poetry? Give it a parameter - "autumn" or something of that nature (no pun intended) - and compete against a human opponent to write meaningful poetry in a limited amount of time.

    --
    "What good's an honest soldier if he can be ordered to behave like a terrorist?"